Headlines

UK wins lawsuit against firm over gowns contract in COVID pandemic

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on October 1, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 21, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Ukrainian President Zelenskiy emphasizes land sovereignty against occupiers - Global Banking & Finance Review
The image captures President Zelenskiy during a press conference, asserting Ukraine's commitment to sovereignty and territorial integrity. This aligns with his statement that Ukrainians will not concede land to occupiers, emphasizing the nation's resolve amidst geopolitical tensions.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON (Reuters) -Britain's government on Wednesday won its lawsuit against a firm at the centre of a row over the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, with

UK Government Prevails in Lawsuit Against PPE Supplier Over Gowns

Legal Battle Over PPE Supply Contracts

LONDON (Reuters) -Britain's government on Wednesday won its lawsuit against a firm at the centre of a row over the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, with London's High Court awarding 122 million pounds ($164.3 million) in damages.

Background of the Lawsuit

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) sued PPE Medpro in 2022, alleging the firm was in breach of a June 2020 contract to supply 25 million sterile surgical gowns.

Court Ruling and Implications

The then-Conservative government was repeatedly criticised during and after the pandemic over deals awarded to those with links to people in power, including via a so-called VIP lane.

Political Repercussions

DHSC said the gowns were not properly sterilised and so could not be used in healthcare, meaning it was entitled to reject the gowns and recoup the money it spent.

Financial Outlook for PPE Medpro

PPE Medpro – a company linked to Michelle Mone, a lawmaker from the opposition Conservatives who were in power during the pandemic – argued DHSC had simply experienced "buyer's remorse" and that the gowns were provided according to the contract.

Judge Sara Cockerill ruled in the government's favour, saying the gowns were not properly validated as being sterile. She rejected the government's claim for 8.6 million pounds in storage costs.

PPE Medpro has been at the centre of a political row over PPE contracts it was awarded during the pandemic.

Mone said the decision was "shocking but all too predictable", posting a statement online which described her husband as PPE Medpro's "principal backer" and the couple as "scapegoats for this disgraceful waste of taxpayers' money".

It is unclear if the government will be able to recoup 122 million pounds from PPE Medpro, whose most recent accounts showed it has net assets of less than 700,000 pounds.

PPE Medpro filed a notice to appoint an administrator at the High Court on Tuesday, according to court records.

($1 = 0.7427 pounds)

(Reporting by Sam Tobin, editing by Ed Osmond)

Key Takeaways

  • UK government wins lawsuit against PPE Medpro.
  • High Court awards £122 million in damages.
  • PPE Medpro linked to political controversy.
  • Gowns deemed unsterile and unusable.
  • PPE Medpro files for administration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a High Court?
A High Court is a superior court in the judicial system that handles serious civil and criminal cases, often with the authority to make significant legal rulings.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category