Headlines

Barrick must pay dealmaker Hannam $2 million over Randgold merger, UK court rules

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 12, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 24, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Barrick must pay dealmaker Hannam $2 million over Randgold merger, UK court rules
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

Barrick Ordered to Pay $2 Million to Hannam for Randgold Deal

LONDON (Reuters) - Canada's Barrick Gold must pay British dealmaker Ian Hannam's firm $2 million plus expenses for his work on the acquisition of gold miner Randgold Resources, London's High Court ruled on Wednesday.

Hannam was formerly one of JPMorgan's top rainmakers and nicknamed the "king of mining" for his record of brokering deals in the resources sector, including the merger that created BHP Billiton in 2001 and the 2012 merger of Glencore and Xstrata.

His advisory boutique Hannam & Partners sued over an agreement he says was reached shortly before Barrick's 2018 acquisition of Randgold.

Hannam & Partners said it was promised a minimum of $10 million, with the figure to increase if the deal was worth more than $10 billion.

After Barrick and Randgold agreed a deal ultimately worth some $18 billion, Hannam asked for $18 million and was rebuffed.

Randgold's lawyers said there was no written evidence of the alleged agreement and that Hannam & Partners was not due any payment.

Judge Simon Gleeson said in a written ruling that "no contract to provide investment advisory services was ever made".

But he added: "The claimant's (Hannam & Partners') early work in promoting the transaction conferred a valuable benefit on both Randgold and Barrick.

"Both Randgold and Barrick recognised this, and intended to make some payment to the claimant in respect of the value which they felt that they had received. They estimated this as being an amount of $2 million."

Gleeson said that Hannam & Partners was therefore entitled to $2 million plus its expenses.

Hannam & Partners' CEO Neil Passmore said the decision was "a seminal judgment for the investment banking industry with a substantial award of fees for work undertaken on a handshake, despite the fact there was no written contract".

Barrick also claimed the ruling as a victory, saying Hannam & Partners had been awarded "the amount Randgold proposed to pay (Hannam & Partners) in September 2018 for its limited involvement in the transaction".

(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Mark Potter)

Key Takeaways

  • Barrick Gold must pay $2 million to Hannam & Partners.
  • The payment is for advisory work on the Randgold merger.
  • The UK court ruled there was no formal contract.
  • Hannam & Partners initially sought $18 million.
  • The ruling is significant for investment banking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The article discusses a UK court ruling requiring Barrick Gold to pay $2 million to Ian Hannam's firm for advisory work on the Randgold merger.
Why was Hannam & Partners awarded $2 million?
The court recognized the firm's early work on the merger as valuable, despite no formal contract.
What was the initial claim by Hannam & Partners?
Hannam & Partners initially sought $18 million based on the merger's value.

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category