Headlines

Britain and EU face off in court over post-Brexit fishing rights

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 28, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Lawmaker Kim Leadbeater discusses UK's assisted dying law changes - Global Banking & Finance Review
Image of Kim Leadbeater addressing the media about proposed changes to the UK's assisted dying law, emphasizing the removal of High Court judge sign-off to enhance the legislative process.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Stephanie van den Berg THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Britain and the European Union go to court for the first time on Tuesday to resolve a dispute over post-Brexit fishing rights, a case that could

UK and EU Face Legal Battle Over Post-Brexit Fishing Rights

By Stephanie van den Berg

THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Britain and the European Union go to court for the first time on Tuesday to resolve a dispute over post-Brexit fishing rights, a case that could complicate Britain's planned "reset" of relations with the bloc.

A three-person panel at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague will hear arguments from both sides for three days on whether a British ban on fishing sandeels in its North Sea waters breaches the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA).

The three legal experts from France, New Zealand, and South Africa have until late April to deliver a final ruling.

In financial terms, the case is trifling. Britain puts the revenue loss for non-UK vessels at 45 million pounds ($56.3 million) in a worst-case scenario.

Politically, it could prove awkward.    

The three-person tribunal can uphold the ban or rule it breaches the TCA, allowing the EU to retaliate if it is not lifted.

That would upset environmentalists and Brexiteers, who could pressure Britain's Labour government not to yield, a stance that would hamper hopes for better ties with the bloc.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is due to join EU leaders for a retreat on Monday and discuss closer defence ties to counter Russia and to respond to U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that NATO members increase military spending.

Britain is also expected to address other areas in the coming months, such as a veterinary agreement with the EU that would ease agricultural and food trade.

It says the fishing ban is necessary, reflecting scientific advice on the resilience of the species and the role it plays in the food chain of predators  - larger fish, marine mammals, and seabirds such as puffins.

British boats do not fish for the small eel-like fish, but sandeels are caught by Danish fleets and used as animal feed and a source of oil.

The EU contends the ban is discriminatory, disproportionate, and not based on the best available scientific evidence. It says the sand eel fishing prohibition constitutes an unjustified restriction on the access of EU vessels to UK waters granted by the TCA.($1 = 0.7998 pounds)

(Additional reporting and writing by Philip Blenkinsop in Brussels; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

Key Takeaways

  • UK and EU are in court over post-Brexit fishing rights.
  • The dispute centers on a UK ban on fishing sandeels.
  • The case could affect UK-EU relations and trade agreements.
  • Environmental and political implications are significant.
  • A ruling is expected by late April from the arbitration panel.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The main topic is the UK-EU court case over post-Brexit fishing rights, specifically the UK's ban on sandeels fishing.
Why is the fishing ban controversial?
The ban is seen as discriminatory by the EU and could breach the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, leading to potential retaliation.
What are the potential outcomes of the case?
The tribunal could uphold the ban or rule it breaches the TCA, impacting UK-EU relations and environmental policies.

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category