COPENHAGEN (Reuters) -European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Saturday it was not possible to imagine giving back Russian assets frozen inside the bloc due to the war in Ukraine unless
EU Explores Options to Utilize Frozen Russian Assets for Ukraine's Recovery
EU's Consideration of Frozen Assets for Ukraine
By Andrew Gray
COPENHAGEN (Reuters) -The European Union will examine how to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine's defence and reconstruction after the war but confiscating them now is not politically realistic, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Saturday.
Some 210 billion euros ($245.85 billion) of Russian assets are frozen in the bloc under sanctions imposed on Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine, according to the EU.
Current Status of Frozen Assets
Ukraine and some EU countries, including Estonia, Lithuania and Poland, have said the assets should be seized now and used to support Kyiv. Those calls have intensified as Ukraine faces a funding gap of tens of billions of euros for next year alone.
Legal and Financial Concerns
But EU heavyweights France and Germany - along with Belgium, which holds most of the assets - have rebuffed the idea.
International Reactions and Agreements
They have questioned the legality of such a move and its potential impact on the euro currency, while noting that profits from the assets are being used to support Ukraine.
Speaking after a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Copenhagen, Kallas said everyone had agreed it was "unthinkable that Russia will ever see this money again unless it fully compensates Ukraine" for damage caused by the war.
"We don't see them paying for the damages. So we need to have an exit strategy" for using the assets whenever the war comes to an end, Kallas said.
Most of the assets are held in Euroclear, a securities depository in Belgium, whose foreign minister, Maxime Prevot, said any seizure was out of the question for now.
"Those assets are solidly protected under international law," he told reporters in Copenhagen. "Confiscating them would trigger systemic financial instability and also erode trust in the euro."
Prevot also rejected calls for a change in the investment strategy for the profits from the assets, with the aim of securing higher yields. He said that would be too risky, financially and legally.
Last year, the G7 group of nations - including the EU - agreed to use the profits generated by the assets to fund a $50 billion loan for Ukraine.
"Belgium and many other countries are not willing to discuss (taking the assets) now ... but everybody agrees ... that Russia should pay for the damages, not our taxpayers," Kallas said.
Russia has signalled it could agree to using the frozen assets for reconstruction in Ukraine but will insist that part of the money is spent on areas of the country that its forces control, sources told Reuters in February this year.
(Reporting by Andrew Gray, editing by Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen and Barbara Lewis)
