Finance

Chinese EV makers file challenges to tariffs at EU court

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 23, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Chinese EV makers challenge EU import tariffs in court - Global Banking & Finance Review
The featured image depicts legal documents symbolizing the challenges filed by Chinese electric vehicle makers against the EU's import tariffs, highlighting the ongoing trade dispute and its implications for the finance sector.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Philip Blenkinsop BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Chinese electric vehicle (EV) makers BYD, Geely and SAIC have challenged the EU's import tariffs at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), filings

Chinese EV Makers Contest EU Tariffs at European Court

By Philip Blenkinsop

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Chinese electric vehicle (EV) makers BYD, Geely and SAIC have challenged the EU's import tariffs at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), filings on the court's website showed on Thursday.

The European Union imposed tariffs on China-made EVs at the end of October after an anti-subsidy investigation, including 17.0% for BYD, 18.8% for Geely and 35.3% for SAIC, on top of the EU's standard car import duty of 10%.

Court filings show all three have lodged their complaints at the General Court, the lower of two CJEU chambers, on Tuesday, a day before the deadline for filing challenges. Proceedings at the General Court last on average 18 months and can be appealed.

No further details of the cases were given.

The European Commission said it was aware of the cases and had two months and 10 days to prepare its defence.

It is not clear if there have been also challenges from other EV makers, including European firms producing in China, or the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME), which has represented Chinese EV producers.

The challenges are likely to include arguments over the assessment of subsidies, the establishment of injury to EU industry and the Commission's unusual decision to launch a case on its own, rather than following an industry complaint.

SAIC is expected to take issue with its far higher tariff. This followed a determination that it did not cooperate with the investigation, allowing the Commission to fill in missing sections with selected available facts.

China-based EV makers have also complained that Tesla, the largest exporter of EVs from China into the EU, was not included in the official sample, from which the rate for other companies is calculated. The sampled companies were BYD, Geely and SAIC.

Tesla secured the lowest extra tariff of 7.8%. If it had been part of the sample, cooperating companies would have benefited from a lower tariff than the 20.7% they now face.

(Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

Key Takeaways

  • Chinese EV makers BYD, Geely, and SAIC challenge EU tariffs.
  • Tariffs imposed after an anti-subsidy investigation.
  • Court filings made at the General Court of the CJEU.
  • Proceedings may last 18 months with possible appeals.
  • Tesla was not included in the official sample for tariffs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The main topic is the challenge by Chinese EV makers against EU import tariffs at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Why were the tariffs imposed?
The tariffs were imposed following an anti-subsidy investigation by the European Union.
Which companies are involved in the challenge?
The companies involved are Chinese EV makers BYD, Geely, and SAIC.

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category