Headlines

Finland charges Eagle S tanker captain, officers over cable cuts

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on August 11, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 22, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Eagle S tanker involved in undersea cable damage case in Finland - Global Banking & Finance Review
The Eagle S oil tanker, accused of damaging undersea cables in the Gulf of Finland, faces legal charges. This incident highlights growing concerns over maritime safety and infrastructure security in the Baltic Sea region.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

HELSINKI (Reuters) -Finland's national prosecutor's office said on Monday it has brought charges against the captain and first and second officers of the Eagle S oil tanker over the cutting of

Finland Prosecutes Eagle S Tanker Crew for Undersea Cable Damage

By Essi Lehto

HELSINKI (Reuters) -Finland's national prosecutor's office said on Monday it had brought charges against the captain and first and second officers of the Eagle S oil tanker over the cutting of undersea cables in the Gulf of Finland in December.

The Georgian and Indian nationals are suspected of aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with communications by dragging the ship's anchor for around 90 km (56 miles) across the seabed, a prosecutors' statement said.

The defendants, who are not permitted to leave Finland, have denied committing the offences and consider that Finland also lacks jurisdiction in the case as the incident took place outside Finnish territorial waters, it said.

Finnish authorities have said the Cook Islands-registered Eagle S broke the Estlink 2 undersea power cable connecting Finland and Estonia as well as four internet lines.

"The owners of the cables have suffered a total of at least 60 million euros ($70 million) in immediate damage in the form of repair costs alone," the prosecutors' office said.

The Baltic Sea region has been on high alert for sabotage after a string of outages of power cables, gas pipelines and telecoms, although subsea infrastructure is also subject to technical malfunctions and outages caused by accidents.

The Eagle S disruption caused serious risks to energy supply and telecommunications in Finland, although services were secured via alternative connections, the prosecutors' statement said.

A lawyer for United Arab Emirates-based Caravella LLC FZ, the owner of the Eagle S, has previously said Helsinki lacked jurisdiction to intervene in the case.

The lawyer for the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday.

The prosecutors' office said a local court would set a date for hearing the case and, if necessary, determine whether it falls under Finnish jurisdiction.

($1 = 0.8590 euros)

(Reporting by Essi Lehto, editing by Terje Solsvik and Toby Chopra)

Key Takeaways

  • Finland charges Eagle S tanker crew for cable damage.
  • Incident caused €60 million in repair costs.
  • Jurisdiction dispute as incident occurred outside Finnish waters.
  • Cable damage affected power and internet lines.
  • Baltic Sea on alert for potential sabotage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What charges have been brought against the Eagle S crew?
The captain and first and second officers of the Eagle S tanker have been charged with aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with communications.
What damage did the Eagle S tanker cause?
The Eagle S tanker broke the Estlink 2 undersea power cable and four internet lines, resulting in at least 60 million euros in immediate repair costs.
What is the current status of the defendants?
The defendants are not permitted to leave Finland and have denied the charges, claiming that Finland lacks jurisdiction since the incident occurred outside its territory.
How has the Baltic Sea region responded to recent incidents?
The Baltic Sea region has been on high alert for sabotage due to a series of outages affecting power cables, gas pipelines, and telecommunications.
What will happen next in the legal process?
A local court in Finland will set a date for the hearing of the case and determine whether it falls under Finnish jurisdiction.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category