Finance

Wise co-founder opposes US listing proposal over voting rights changes

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on July 21, 2025

3 min read

· Last updated: January 22, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Ukrainian President Zelenskiy emphasizes land sovereignty against occupiers - Global Banking & Finance Review
The image captures President Zelenskiy during a press conference, asserting Ukraine's commitment to sovereignty and territorial integrity. This aligns with his statement that Ukrainians will not concede land to occupiers, emphasizing the nation's resolve amidst geopolitical tensions.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Elizabeth Howcroft (Reuters) -One of the founders of money transfer company Wise has urged shareholders to reject plans to move the company to the U.S. because the plans also include changes to the

Wise Co-Founder Urges Rejection of U.S. Listing Plan Over Governance Changes

By Elizabeth Howcroft

(Reuters) -One of the founders of money transfer company Wise has urged shareholders to reject plans to move the company to the U.S. because the plans also include changes to the shareholder structure which he said were buried in the proposal.

Founded in 2011 by two Estonians, Taavet Hinrikus and Kristo Kaarman, London-listed Wise said in June that it planned to move its primary listing to New York. Shareholders are due to vote on the plans on July 28.

Hinrikus, who has left the company but still owns a 5.1% stake via his company Skaala Investments, criticised Wise's plans in a statement made public on Monday, saying they also included extending voting rights for one group of shareholders.

The plans would entrench "disproportionate power in the hands of a few", including Wise's CEO Kaarman, Skaala said in its statement which was originally sent to Wise and included in a stock exchange filing by Wise on Monday.

Wise has a dual share structure, in which shareholders with "Class B" stocks have more voting power than those with "Class A" stocks. Under Wise's new proposals, these extra rights for "Class B" shareholders would be extended for 10 years - rather than ending in July 2026 as originally planned.

Wise said in its response that while it takes Hinrikus's views seriously, the dual-class share structure is essential for the company's success.

In its proposal documents, Wise said that dual-class share structures "support management's ability to focus and execute on their long-term and often founder-led vision".

Skaala said that the extension "significantly deviates from accepted governance norms" and urged shareholders to reject the proposal.

The dispute could complicate Wise's U.S. plans, which were intended to give it access to the world's largest capital markets while maintaining a secondary listing in London.

Skaala said it was "entirely inappropriate and unfair" to combine the listing location and governance changes into a single vote.

"This approach diminishes shareholder democracy, contradicts good corporate governance and violates Wise's values," it said.

Skaala said that a number of other shareholders are also opposed to the plans, without giving further details.

A spokesperson for Wise said on Monday that shareholders have so far been "overwhelmingly in favour" of the proposal and cited the backing of proxy advisors including ISS, Glass Lewis and PIRC.

Wise said that the process was fair, and that multiple corporate changes can be voted for under one proposal.

(Reporting by Elizabeth Howcroft; Editing by Susan Fenton)

Key Takeaways

  • Wise plans to move its primary listing to New York.
  • Co-founder Taavet Hinrikus opposes the proposal.
  • Concerns over extended voting rights for 'Class B' shareholders.
  • Potential impact on shareholder democracy and governance.
  • Proposal has backing from proxy advisors despite opposition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Wise's proposal regarding its listing?
Wise plans to move its primary listing to New York while maintaining a secondary listing in London.
What are the concerns raised by Taavet Hinrikus?
Hinrikus criticized the proposal for including changes to the shareholder structure that would give disproportionate power to a few individuals.
How does Wise defend its dual-class share structure?
Wise argues that the dual-class share structure is essential for the company's success and helps management focus on long-term goals.
What is Skaala's stance on the proposed changes?
Skaala opposes the proposal, stating it deviates from accepted governance norms and undermines shareholder democracy.
What has been the response from other shareholders?
Skaala mentioned that several other shareholders are also opposed to the plans, although specific details were not provided.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category