Finance

Analysis-Politics, not climate, to drive sustainable finance trends in 2025

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 10, 2025

4 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Political and financial symbols representing sustainable finance trends in 2025 - Global Banking & Finance Review
The featured image illustrates the intersection of politics and sustainable finance trends anticipated in 2025, highlighting key issues like regulatory divergence and ESG policies. This visual represents the article's focus on how political changes, particularly in the U.S., will shape sustainable investment landscapes.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Simon Jessop LONDON (Reuters) - A turbulent year for sustainable finance is set to continue in 2025 as the return of Donald Trump as U.S. president heralds more regional divergence on everything

Politics to Influence Sustainable Finance Trends in 2025

By Simon Jessop

LONDON (Reuters) - A turbulent year for sustainable finance is set to continue in 2025 as the return of Donald Trump as U.S. president heralds more regional divergence on everything from fund flows to legal cases and market regulations.

Despite record high temperatures and more extreme weather events across the planet last year, the policy response by governments still remains too slow to meet the world's near 10-year-old goal of limiting global warming.

While regulators everywhere are gradually toughening up the rules that govern finance and companies in the real economy in an effort to cut climate-damaging carbon emissions faster, the pace of change is uneven with the U.S. already lagging Europe.

A turbo-charged U.S. political backlash over environmental, social and governance-related (ESG) policies under Trump means that gap could widen even if, in many cases, the economics, companies' near-term emissions reduction pledges and the rising costs of climate events keep the broad direction unchanged.

"We anticipate that in 2025, we'll see a resilience for sustainable investment globally, although it's likely that there will remain core differences between the U.S. and Europe's approach," said Tom Willman, Regulatory Lead at sustainability tech firm Clarity AI.

"In the U.S., we can expect a more conservative approach, with investors prioritising long-term risk-adjusted returns to avoid potential political or reputational risks."

While just over half of U.S. executives expect new or expanded sustainability regulations this year, in Britain that figure is 60% and Singapore 80%, a December survey of 1,600 executives by Workiva showed.

The U.S. political reality has already spurred some U.S. firms to curtail their climate and diversity efforts to avoid censure. In the latest sign of corporates changing tack, the biggest U.S. banks recently left a sector coalition aimed at cutting emissions.

Legal pressure is also building on the world's climate efforts. One in five climate litigation cases were not aligned with policies to reduce emissions, analysis last year by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment showed. The majority of these were in the United States.

The regional split was evident among sustainable investment in the year to the end of September, with U.S. funds seeing clients withdraw a combined $15.9 billion as European funds took in $37.3 billion, data from industry tracker Morningstar showed.

The number of new ESG-focused funds launched in the United States, meanwhile, fell to just 7 against 189 in Europe.

Across the world, more sustainable funds were closed than launched for the first time, hit by the U.S. backlash, increasingly tough European Union rules aimed at forcing funds to evidence their sustainability credentials and market consolidation.

Demand for sustainable funds lagged the broader market in part because of mixed performance, concerns around whether some funds were as green as they purported to be, regulatory uncertainty and the ESG backlash, said Hortense Bioy, Head of Sustainable Investing Research, Morningstar Sustainalytics.

Despite an uncertain outlook given the potential for Trump to water down some ESG initiatives, for example government support for electric vehicles, many of the underlying market drivers of demand for sustainable finance, such as the need for green energy, remained, she added.

Charles French, co-chief investment officer at Impax Asset Management, said despite Trump's negative view on climate change - he has called it a hoax - companies in sectors from healthcare and industrials were eyeing climate tech solutions to cut costs.

"The era of tech-inspired transformation is not coming to an end. In many areas, it's just getting started," he said.

The amount of money raised through sustainable bonds also continued to rise in the Americas, up 16.9%, and Europe, up 10.7%, in 2024, data from LSEG showed.

Given the competing pressures, Leon Kamhi, head of responsibility at asset manager Federated Hermes, said he expected investors to "mature" and focus on the impacts being achieved in the real economy.

"For the transition to be successful, it is essential that such investments yield economic returns for both companies and investors alike."

(Editing by Toby Chopra)

Key Takeaways

  • Politics will drive sustainable finance trends in 2025.
  • U.S. and Europe show diverging approaches to ESG policies.
  • U.S. firms may reduce climate efforts under political pressure.
  • Sustainable bond issuance continues to grow in Americas and Europe.
  • Demand for sustainable finance remains despite political challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The article discusses how politics, rather than climate, will drive sustainable finance trends in 2025, with a focus on regional differences.
How will U.S. and Europe differ in their approach?
The U.S. may adopt a more conservative approach to ESG policies, while Europe continues to push for stricter regulations.
What impact will politics have on sustainable finance?
Political changes, such as Trump's return, could lead to reduced climate efforts by U.S. firms and influence global sustainable finance trends.

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category