Finance

Rio Tinto says no economic incentive for green steel in Australia

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on August 7, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 22, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Rio Tinto says no economic incentive for green steel in Australia
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

MELBOURNE (Reuters) -Rio Tinto joined peer BHP on Thursday to play down Australia's prospects of building out a "green iron" sector that would help decarbonise the steel industry because the country

Rio Tinto Questions Economic Viability of Green Steel in Australia

MELBOURNE (Reuters) -Rio Tinto joined peer BHP on Thursday to play down Australia's prospects of building out a "green iron" sector that would help decarbonise the steel industry because the country lacks the economic incentives to do so.

Australia is the world's largest supplier of seaborne iron ore and has been striving to build a role as a reliable source of green metals. In February the government allocated A$1 billion ($652.4 million) to support the manufacture of green iron and its supply chains.

Since Australia's iron ore is mostly too low-grade to be directly processed into steel with renewable energy, it needs an additional processing step. When this is undertaken with hydrogen made from renewable energy instead of coal, the product is called hydrogen direct reduced iron (DRI) or "green iron", a low-carbon base for making green steel.

"Today I don't believe there is an economic incentive for anybody to move to a hydrogen DRI," Rio Tinto's chief technical officer Mark Davies said.

The technology was unproven, and there were complications moving from existing processes using natural gas to hydrogen, he told a business lunch in Melbourne.

"And doing it in Australia is expensive. It's an expensive place to build stuff," he said.

Major miner BHP said last month it was too costly for Australia to build a "green iron" industry, even after the country and China agreed to jointly work to decarbonise the steel supply chain, responsible for nearly a 10th of global emissions.

A global carbon price of "a couple of hundred dollars" would be needed to create that incentive, Davies later told a press briefing.

($1 = 1.5328 Australian dollars)

(Reporting by Melanie Burton;Editing by Alison Williams)

Key Takeaways

  • Rio Tinto sees no economic incentive for green steel in Australia.
  • Australia's iron ore needs additional processing for green steel.
  • Hydrogen DRI technology is unproven and costly in Australia.
  • BHP also views green iron industry as too costly in Australia.
  • Global carbon pricing needed to incentivize green steel.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Rio Tinto say about green steel in Australia?
Rio Tinto stated that there is currently no economic incentive for anyone to transition to hydrogen Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) in Australia.
Why is Australia struggling to develop a green iron sector?
Australia's iron ore is mostly too low-grade for direct processing into steel with renewable energy, necessitating an additional processing step.
What did BHP mention regarding the costs of green iron production?
BHP indicated that it is too costly for Australia to establish a green iron industry, despite efforts to decarbonise the steel supply chain.
What is needed to create an economic incentive for green steel?
A global carbon price of 'a couple of hundred dollars' would be necessary to create an economic incentive for transitioning to hydrogen DRI.
What challenges did Rio Tinto's chief technical officer mention?
Mark Davies highlighted that the technology for hydrogen DRI is unproven and that transitioning from natural gas to hydrogen presents complications.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category