Finance

We do not censor social media, EU says in response to Meta

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 24, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
European Commission spokesperson discussing social media regulation - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image features a European Commission spokesperson addressing media inquiries about Meta's claims of social media censorship in the EU. It highlights ongoing debates about digital content moderation and regulation.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Philip Blenkinsop BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission rejected on Wednesday Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg's assertion that European Union data laws censored social media and said they only

We do not censor social media, EU says in response to Meta

By Philip Blenkinsop

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission rejected on Wednesday Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg's assertion that European Union data laws censored social media and said they only required large platforms to remove illegal content.

Meta Platforms scrapped its U.S. fact-checking programs and its CEO said he would work with President-elect Donald Trump to push back on censorship around the world.

"Europe has an ever increasing number of laws institutionalising censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there," Zuckerberg said.

The European Commission, the EU executive, said its Digital Services Act did not force or request platforms to remove lawful content but only to take down content that may be harmful, such as to children or to the EU's democracies.

"We absolutely refute any claims of censorship," a Commission spokesperson said.

Zuckerberg said Meta would get rid of fact-checkers for Facebook, Instagram and Threads, starting in the United States, and replace it with a "community notes" system similar to that used by X. X's system allows contributors to write a note on a post they believe is misleading. The note is made public if enough contributors from different points of view rate it as helpful.

The Commission said that, for such a system to be used in the European Union, a platform would have to conduct a risk assessment and send it to the EU executive. A spokesperson said the EU did not prescribe the form that content moderation should take and that community notes could be a possibility.

"Whatever model a platform chooses needs to be effective, and this is what we're looking at... So we are checking the effectiveness of the measures or content moderation policies adopted and implemented by platforms here in the EU," the spokesperson said.

The Commission said EU users would continue to benefit from input from independent fact-checking of content posted in the United States.

(Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Key Takeaways

  • The EU denies censoring social media as claimed by Meta.
  • The Digital Services Act targets illegal content only.
  • Meta plans to replace fact-checkers with community notes.
  • The EU requires platforms to assess content moderation risks.
  • Independent fact-checking remains in the EU for US content.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Zuckerberg claim about EU data laws?
Zuckerberg claimed that the European Union's data laws institutionalize censorship and hinder innovation.
How did the European Commission respond to Zuckerberg's claims?
The European Commission refuted claims of censorship, stating that the Digital Services Act does not require platforms to remove lawful content.
What changes is Meta implementing regarding fact-checking?
Meta is scrapping its U.S. fact-checking programs and replacing them with a 'community notes' system, similar to that used by X.
What is required for platforms to use a community notes system in the EU?
For such a system to be used in the EU, platforms must conduct a risk assessment and submit it to the EU executive.
Will EU users still have access to independent fact-checking?
Yes, the Commission stated that EU users would continue to benefit from independent fact-checking of content posted in the United States.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category