Headlines

South Korea wins UK appeal over arbitration ruling in Samsung merger case

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on July 17, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 22, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
South Korea wins UK appeal over arbitration ruling in Samsung merger case
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON (Reuters) -South Korea on Thursday won its latest appeal in its dispute with U.S. hedge fund Elliott over the 2015 merger of two affiliates of Samsung, shortly after the electronics group's

South Korea Prevails in UK Court Over Samsung Merger Arbitration

LONDON (Reuters) -South Korea on Thursday won its latest appeal in its dispute with U.S. hedge fund Elliott over the 2015 merger of two affiliates of Samsung, shortly after the electronics group's Chairman Jay Y. Lee was cleared by South Korea's top court.

The South Korean government was ordered to pay Elliott around $100 million by the Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2023.

Elliott had sued over the role played by South Korea's National Pension Service in approving the $8 billion merger between Samsung C&T, in which Elliott was a minority stakeholder, and Cheil Industries.

South Korea sought to challenge the tribunal's decision at London's High Court, arguing the tribunal did not have jurisdiction under a free trade agreement with the U.S., but its case was rejected last year.

The Court of Appeal, however, allowed South Korea's appeal and sent the case back to the High Court, to decide the challenge to the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction.

Its ruling came hours after Lee was ultimately cleared of accounting fraud and stock manipulation over the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries.

South Korea's Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of prosecutors' appeal against a Seoul court's 2024 decision to clear Lee, removing a long-running legal risk for the head of the country's biggest company Samsung Electronics.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin, Editing by Paul Sandle)

Key Takeaways

  • South Korea wins UK appeal in Samsung merger case.
  • Elliott sued over Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries merger.
  • UK Court of Appeal sends case back to High Court.
  • Jay Y. Lee cleared of fraud related to the merger.
  • South Korea challenges tribunal's jurisdiction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of South Korea's appeal in the Samsung merger case?
South Korea won its appeal in the dispute with Elliott over the 2015 merger, with the Court of Appeal sending the case back to the High Court to decide on the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction.
How much was South Korea ordered to pay Elliott in the arbitration ruling?
The Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration ordered South Korea to pay Elliott around $100 million in 2023.
What role did the National Pension Service play in the merger?
Elliott sued over the National Pension Service's approval of the $8 billion merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries, where Elliott was a minority stakeholder.
What was the significance of Lee's legal situation in relation to the merger?
Lee was cleared of accounting fraud and stock manipulation related to the merger, which removed a long-running legal risk for the head of Samsung.
What was the basis for South Korea's challenge to the tribunal's decision?
South Korea argued that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction under a free trade agreement with the U.S., but this argument was initially rejected by the High Court.

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category