Finance

Implicit state guarantee for UBS is worth billions, study says

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 29, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Graph illustrating UBS's implicit state guarantee benefits in finance - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image depicts key findings from a study on UBS's implicit state guarantee, highlighting its financial benefits and implications for banking regulation amid recent industry changes.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

ZURICH (Reuters) - Swiss bank UBS effectively benefits from a state guarantee that has reduced its costs by billions, a study from the University of Bern has found. The study, published on Tuesday,

Study Reveals UBS Benefits from Implicit State Guarantee Worth Billions

ZURICH (Reuters) - Swiss bank UBS effectively benefits from a state guarantee that has reduced its costs by billions, a study from the University of Bern has found.

The study, published on Tuesday, feeds a debate on banking regulation as the parliament considers how to reform the rules in the light of the 2023 collapse of Credit Suisse and its subsequent takeover by UBS, which had long been its rival.

The University of Bern examined Swiss plans to create what is known as a public liquidity backstop (PLB) to protect systemically important banks in the event of a crisis.

It said UBS' status as a lender that is considered too big to fail amounted to a state guarantee and lowered the bank's funding costs in 2022 by at least $2.9 billion.

Asked by Reuters about the report, UBS referred to previous statements by CEO Sergio Ermotti in which he disputed that the bank had such a guarantee.

UBS had the capacity to absorb losses of $200 billion and did not rely on taxpayers to bear risks, Ermotti said in 2024.

The 32-page university study said "a government guarantee for liquidity support, like other too-big-to-fail (TBTF) policies, effectively subsidises non-convertible bond financing for SIBs (systemically important banks)".

This had the effect of "encouraging a leverage-heavy funding model that, when combined with limited liability, distorts the incentives of shareholders and management," it added.

Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter said in April she believed UBS had an implicit state guarantee.

To help fund the PLB, the government said in 2023 a fee in the range of 70 million-210 million ($77 million-$232 million) Swiss francs would have been appropriate for its five SIBs in 2022.

UBS's takeover of Credit Suisse was engineered with the support of Swiss authorities. It created a bank with a balance sheet far bigger than the Swiss economy and sparked calls for tougher regulation of the combined institution.

(Reporting by Ariane Luthi and Oliver Hirt, Editing by Dave Graham and Barbara Lewis)

Key Takeaways

  • UBS benefits from an implicit state guarantee reducing costs.
  • The University of Bern study highlights regulatory debates.
  • UBS's funding costs were lowered by $2.9 billion in 2022.
  • Swiss Finance Minister acknowledges the implicit guarantee.
  • The UBS-Credit Suisse merger prompts calls for tougher regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the study from the University of Bern find about UBS?
The study found that UBS effectively benefits from a state guarantee, which has reduced its costs by billions, specifically lowering its funding costs by at least $2.9 billion in 2022.
How does UBS's status as too big to fail affect its funding?
UBS's status as a lender considered too big to fail amounts to a state guarantee, which effectively subsidizes its non-convertible bond financing and encourages a leverage-heavy funding model.
What did Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter say about UBS?
Karin Keller-Sutter stated in April that she believed UBS had an implicit state guarantee, reflecting concerns about the bank's financial stability.
What was UBS's response to the study's findings?
UBS referred to previous statements by CEO Sergio Ermotti, who disputed the existence of such a guarantee, asserting that UBS had the capacity to absorb significant losses without relying on taxpayers.
What fee did the government propose for the public liquidity backstop?
The government suggested that a fee in the range of 70 million to 210 million Swiss francs would have been appropriate for its five systemically important banks in 2022.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category