Headlines

UN passes climate change motion after Marshall Islands drops fossil fuels focus

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on July 8, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 23, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
UN passes climate change motion after Marshall Islands drops fossil fuels focus
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Emma Farge GENEVA (Reuters) -Countries are set to vote at the U.N. Human Rights Council on Tuesday on a pledge to phase out fossil fuels to fight climate change, with diplomats warning that Gulf

UN Approves Climate Change Motion After Marshall Islands Compromise

By Emma Farge

GENEVA (Reuters) -The U.N. Human Rights Council passed a motion on climate change and human rights on Tuesday after the Marshall Islands withdrew a divisive amendment that called on states to recommit to a phase-out of fossil fuels.

The motion calling on countries "to contribute to the global efforts" against climate change passed by consensus and follows the council in 2021 recognising access to a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right.

The original language of the motion had exposed divisions among the 47 members after the Marshall Islands, one of the countries most vulnerable to rising sea levels, made an amendment to the motion to mention exiting fossil fuels as agreed by states at the COP28 climate summit in December 2023.

"My country - like many of our Pacific neighbours - places a high premium on collaboration, dialogue and consensus and we were willing to recognise this by withdrawing our amendment," Doreen Debrum, ambassador of the Marshall Islands to the U.N. in Geneva, told the council.

Instead, the motion referred to "the imperative of defossilizing our economies" in a footnote - allowing the motion to pass without being put to a vote in which the outcome had not been certain.

The council's decisions are not legally binding but help shape global standards.

Oil producing countries including Saudi Arabia and voting member Kuwait had earlier voiced opposition to the phrasing in negotiations, according to three diplomats. Riyadh called instead for "multiple pathways" to reduce emissions.

There was no immediate response to Reuters' requests for comment from Saudi Arabia's international media offices or the foreign ministry of Kuwait. Their diplomatic missions in Geneva did not immediately respond.

Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law, said: "We deeply regret its (the council's) continued failure to explicitly call for an equitable phase-out of fossil fuels — the root cause of the crisis."

The move comes as leaders on climate action, such as the European Union, face criticism from campaigners that they are scaling back policies even as they deal with the consequences of a blistering early summer heatwave.

The U.S., which has withdrawn from climate action under President Donald Trump, did not participate formally in the vote after disengaging with the council this year.

(Reporting by Emma Farge;Editing by Alison Williams)

Key Takeaways

  • UN Human Rights Council passes climate change motion.
  • Marshall Islands withdraws fossil fuel phase-out amendment.
  • Motion calls for global efforts against climate change.
  • Oil-producing countries opposed initial phrasing.
  • The decision helps shape global climate standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the UN Human Rights Council pass?
The UN Human Rights Council passed a motion on climate change and human rights, calling on countries to contribute to global efforts against climate change.
Why did the Marshall Islands withdraw their amendment?
The Marshall Islands withdrew their amendment to promote collaboration and consensus among the council members, allowing the motion to pass without a vote.
What was the response from oil-producing countries?
Oil-producing countries like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait opposed the phrasing of the motion, advocating for a more diversified approach to energy rather than focusing solely on defossilization.
What are the implications of the council's decisions?
While the council's decisions are not legally binding, they help shape global standards regarding climate change and human rights.
How did the U.S. participate in the vote?
The U.S. did not participate formally in the vote after disengaging with the council earlier this year, following its withdrawal from climate action under President Donald Trump.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category