Headlines

Europe's top rights court rules against France in racial profiling case

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 26, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 23, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Europe's top rights court rules against France in racial profiling case
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

PARIS (Reuters) -Europe's top human rights court ruled on Thursday that French police had carried out discriminatory checks on a Frenchman of African descent, the first such verdict in a case of

European Court Rules Against France in Landmark Racial Profiling Case

PARIS (Reuters) -Europe's top human rights court ruled on Thursday that French police had carried out discriminatory checks on a Frenchman of African descent, the first such verdict in a case of racial profiling brought against France.

The French government "failed to provide objective and reasonable justification" for the police carrying out three identity checks on Karim Touil within the space of 10 days in 2011 in the city centre of Besancon, the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said in its ruling.

The court ordered France to pay Touil 3,000 euros ($3,512) for violating articles 14 and 8, on discrimination and the right to a private life, of the European Human Rights Convention.

However, for five other applicants in the case, also young men of African descent, the court found there was no discrimination due to lack of evidence, noting that the ID checks had mostly taken place "against a backdrop of tension".

While welcoming Touil's successful claim, Lanna Hollo, a rights advocate with French organisation RECLAIM, who has been involved in the case for 13 years, said the court's reasoning risked reinforcing discrimination in certain zones.

"It fails to sufficiently protect all people in all parts of the territory - especially those living in France's poorer neighbourhoods with high visible minority populations," she said.

In recent years the court has issued rulings against Germany and Switzerland over discriminatory police checks.

A study published on Tuesday by France's human rights watchdog found that young Black men or those perceived as Arab or North African were four times more likely to be stopped by police and 12 times more likely to undergo "extensive" checks, involving being body-searched or taken to the police station.

($1 = 0.8542 euros)

(Reporting by Layli ForoudiEditing by Gareth Jones)

Key Takeaways

  • European Court of Human Rights ruled against France in a racial profiling case.
  • Karim Touil was subjected to discriminatory police checks.
  • France ordered to pay 3,000 euros for rights violation.
  • Court found no discrimination for five other applicants.
  • Ruling highlights ongoing issues with racial profiling in Europe.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the European Court rule regarding French police?
The European Court ruled that French police conducted discriminatory identity checks on Karim Touil, a Frenchman of African descent, without providing objective justification.
What compensation was ordered for Karim Touil?
The court ordered France to pay Karim Touil 3,000 euros for violating his rights under the European Human Rights Convention.
How did the court's ruling affect other applicants in the case?
The court found that for five other applicants, also young men of African descent, there was no discrimination due to a lack of evidence regarding their ID checks.
What concerns were raised by rights advocates following the ruling?
Rights advocate Lanna Hollo expressed concerns that the court's reasoning might not adequately protect individuals in poorer neighborhoods with high visible minority populations.
What recent findings were reported by France's human rights watchdog?
A recent study found that young Black men or those perceived as Arab or North African were four times more likely to be stopped by police compared to others.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category