Headlines

Russia's Sberbank disagrees with US court allowing MH17 case to move forward

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 6, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 26, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Sberbank logo with legal documents - Russia's banking sector challenges U.S. court ruling - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image features the Sberbank logo alongside legal documents, symbolizing the bank's dispute with a U.S. court over the MH17 airline disaster case. The article discusses Sberbank's stance on sovereign immunity and its implications for international banking.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

(Reuters) - Russian state-owned lender Sberbank on Thursday said it disagreed with a U.S. court's decision to reject the bank's right to sovereign immunity in a case brought by the family of a victim

Sberbank Disputes US Court's MH17 Ruling on Sovereign Immunity

(Reuters) - Russian state-owned lender Sberbank on Thursday said it disagreed with a U.S. court's decision to reject the bank's right to sovereign immunity in a case brought by the family of a victim of the 2014 MH17 airline disaster.

Sberbank said it would continue to fight the case.

The U.S. court ruled on Tuesday that the family of American Quinn Schansman, who was killed when a Malaysian Airlines plane was shot down over Ukraine in 2014, can sue Russia's largest bank for allegedly providing money transfers to a group blamed for downing the plane.

"We have studied the judgement in our appeal, which took the U.S. Court of Appeals more than 14 months to issue," Sberbank said. "Sberbank does not agree with it and will continue to defend its interests in this case."

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said Sberbank was not entitled to sovereign immunity, after being accused of using the U.S. banking system to funnel donor money to the Russia-backed separatist group Donetsk People's Republic (DPR).

Schansman was 18 when he boarded the flight to Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam on July 17, 2014, for a planned family vacation. The plane was shot down over DPR-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine by a surface-to-air missile, killing all 298 people on board.

Russia has denied involvement. Ukraine had previously declared the DPR a terrorist organization, while the United States had imposed sanctions on the group.

(Reporting by Alexander Marrow; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

Key Takeaways

  • Sberbank disagrees with US court's ruling on MH17 case.
  • The court rejected Sberbank's claim to sovereign immunity.
  • The case involves money transfers to the DPR group.
  • Sberbank plans to continue its legal defense.
  • The MH17 disaster killed 298 people in 2014.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The main topic is Sberbank's disagreement with a US court ruling allowing the MH17 case to proceed, rejecting its sovereign immunity claim.
Why is Sberbank involved in the MH17 case?
Sberbank is accused of using the US banking system to transfer funds to the DPR, a group blamed for the MH17 disaster.
What was the outcome of the US court ruling?
The US court ruled that Sberbank is not entitled to sovereign immunity, allowing the MH17 case to proceed.

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category