Headlines

IEA comes under pressure from former oil market chief to cut energy transition focus

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on January 29, 2025

3 min read

· Last updated: January 27, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Former IEA oil chief criticizes agency's focus on energy transition - Global Banking & Finance Review
The image depicts the report launch event where former IEA oil chief Neil Atkinson critiques the agency's energy transition focus, urging a return to oil and gas priorities. This aligns with the article's discussion on the IEA's evolving role amid political pressures.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The International Energy Agency needs to revamp how it writes its annual energy outlook to reflect real-world scenarios, not to bolster its current focus on

Former IEA Oil Chief Urges Agency to Reassess Energy Transition Focus

By Valerie Volcovici

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The International Energy Agency's former oil industry and market chief criticized the agency's focus on the global energy transition in a report released on Wednesday, and said the IEA should concentrate on oil and gas supplies.

The IEA is under fire from the administration of President Donald Trump for a shift in recent years toward a focus on clean energy policy. A senior member of Trump's Republican party and other oil industry representatives were present at a Washington event to mark the report's release.

The Paris-based IEA has provided research and data to industrialized governments for more than half a century to guide policy on energy security, supply and investment. As member countries rapidly build renewable energy supplies and seek input on policies for the shift toward a low-carbon economy, the IEA has shifted with them.

That has drawn criticism from the oil industry, Republicans and Trump and his team, who are refocusing U.S. energy policy on increasing oil and gas output and say that the previous administration's focus on renewables is driving up energy costs.

Trump's campaign last year identified the IEA's climate focus as an issue he could address as president. Trump has leverage over the IEA because the U.S. provides a quarter of its funding. The IEA has also angered other global oil producer countries including Saudi Arabia.

The report published on Wednesday, titled Energy Delusions, was written by the IEA's former head of oil industry and markets, Neil Atkinson, and Mark Mills, director of think tank the National Center for Energy Analytics.

The authors launched the report on Capitol Hill on Wednesday alongside Wyoming Republican Senator John Barrasso and Alan Armstrong, CEO of pipeline firm Williams and current president of the National Petroleum Council. The authors said the report was aimed at influencing the new administration.

The report identifies 23 assumptions made by the agency that led to what it calls a flawed conclusion that global oil output would peak by 2030, and that no new oil and gas investment was needed.

The report says the IEA underestimates growth in emerging economies as well as in plastic and petrochemicals markets, and overestimates the pace of electric vehicle adoption.

"The promotional aspirations and flawed assumptions underlying IEA's peak-demand scenarios have serious implications, given the obvious global economic and security considerations in planning for and delivering reliable, affordable energy supplies," the report said.

The IEA said the report was "full of rudimentary errors" and "fundamental misrepresentations about both energy systems in general and IEA modelling in particular", in a statement issued on Wednesday. The agency said it welcomes ideas for improving its analysis.

"The report also incorrectly suggests the IEA’s oil demand projections are an outlier – in reality, the projections are well aligned with comparable scenarios of other organisations, including major oil companies," the agency said in a statement.

Barrasso, who led a Congressional report criticizing the IEA for its green focus, declined to respond when asked whether he thought IEA chief Fatih Birol should be replaced, but said the agency risks losing its relevance.

"They are going to get ignored because they are basing their proposals on aspirations that are never going to happen and the world is seeing that and elections are rejecting what they want," he said on the sidelines of the event.

(Reporting by Valerie Volcovici in Washington; Editing by Christian Schmollinger, Nia Williams and Lincoln Feast.)

Key Takeaways

  • Former IEA oil chief criticizes energy transition focus.
  • Report suggests IEA should prioritize oil and gas supplies.
  • Trump administration pressures IEA on energy policy.
  • Report claims IEA's assumptions on oil demand are flawed.
  • IEA defends its projections against report's criticisms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What criticism did the former IEA oil chief have?
The former oil industry chief criticized the IEA's focus on clean energy policy and claimed it led to flawed conclusions about global oil output peaking by 2030.
What assumptions did the report challenge?
The report identified 23 assumptions made by the IEA, arguing that it underestimated growth in emerging economies and overestimated the pace of electric vehicle adoption.
How did the IEA respond to the report?
The IEA dismissed the report as 'full of rudimentary errors' and stated that its oil demand projections are aligned with those of other major organizations.
Who supported the report's launch?
The report was launched on Capitol Hill with support from Wyoming Republican Senator John Barrasso and Alan Armstrong, CEO of a pipeline firm.
What implications did the report suggest?
The report suggested that the IEA's flawed assumptions could have serious implications for global economic and security considerations in energy planning.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category