Headlines

Vatican 'utterly let down' by Italian financier over London property investment, UK court rules

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 21, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 26, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Founders of The Entertainer toy chain hand over control to workers - Global Banking & Finance Review
Image depicting the founders of The Entertainer, Gary and Catherine Grant, announcing the transition of their toy retailer to employee ownership, emphasizing the significance of this move in the finance sector.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON (Reuters) - The Vatican was "utterly let down" by an Italian financier over the Catholic Church's botched investment in a high-end London property, a judge ruled on Friday following a trial at

Vatican Disappointed by Italian Financier in London Property Case

LONDON (Reuters) - The Vatican was "utterly let down" by an Italian financier over the Catholic Church's botched investment in a high-end London property, a judge ruled on Friday following a trial at which a senior aide to Pope Francis gave evidence.

Italian financier Raffaele Mincione's case centred on the Vatican's investment in a west London property, which it ultimately sold at a loss of about 140 million euros ($147 million) in 2022.

He sued the Vatican at London's High Court, seeking declarations that he acted "in good faith" in relation to the deal.

The investment led to a long-running corruption trial which exposed infighting and intrigue in the highest echelons of the Vatican, ending with the conviction of a cardinal, Mincione and others in December 2023.

Mincione is appealing against his conviction and has also lodged a complaint with the United Nations' human rights watchdog.

Archbishop Edgar Pena Parra, a senior aide to Pope Francis, gave evidence at the trial of Mincione's lawsuit last year.

Mincione and companies in his WRM Group sought various declarations about their agreement with the Vatican, including that they "had acted in good faith in and about the transaction and the negotiation and execution of the contractual documents".

Judge Robin Knowles said in a written ruling: "On the facts shown at trial the claimants fell below the standards of communication with the state (the Vatican) that could be described as good faith conduct."

He rejected the Vatican's allegations that Mincione and his companies were involved in a conspiracy to defraud the Vatican, but added: "The state had reason to consider itself utterly let down in its experience with the claimants.

"The claimants made no attempt to protect the state from fraudulent bad actors."

Mincione welcomed the ruling, saying in a statement: "I hope the judgment can lay to rest once and for all claims that I am dishonest, or a fraudster, or a criminal."

The Vatican did not respond to a request for comment.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin; additional reporting by Joshua McElwee; editing by Giles Elgood)

Key Takeaways

  • Vatican lost 140 million euros in a London property investment.
  • Italian financier Raffaele Mincione sued the Vatican for good faith declarations.
  • A UK court ruled Mincione fell short of good faith standards.
  • The case exposed Vatican internal conflicts and led to a corruption trial.
  • Mincione is appealing his conviction and has approached the UN.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Vatican's lawsuit against Raffaele Mincione?
A judge ruled that the Vatican was 'utterly let down' by Mincione regarding a botched investment in a London property, leading to a significant financial loss.
How much did the Vatican lose on the London property investment?
The Vatican ultimately sold the west London property at a loss of about 140 million euros, equivalent to approximately $147 million.
What did Mincione claim in his lawsuit against the Vatican?
Mincione sought declarations that he acted 'in good faith' regarding the investment deal with the Vatican.
What did Judge Robin Knowles say about Mincione's actions?
Judge Knowles stated that Mincione and his companies fell below the standards of communication expected in good faith dealings with the Vatican.
What was the Vatican's response to the court ruling?
The Vatican did not respond to a request for comment following the court's ruling on the case.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category