Top Stories

Belgian researchers warn against holiday reliance on COVID antigen tests

Published by Jessica Weisman-Pitts

Posted on December 21, 2021

2 min read

· Last updated: January 28, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Business graph showing Atos stock fluctuations amid M&A talks - Global Banking & Finance Review
An illustrative graph depicting the fluctuations in Atos' stock prices in relation to ongoing M&A discussions with the French government and Thales. This image highlights the volatility of Atos shares amidst potential cybersecurity division acquisitions.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

Belgian Researchers Caution on COVID Antigen Test Use

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) – Belgian researchers on Tuesday issued a pre-holiday warning against over-reliance on COVID-19 rapid antigen tests, saying they believed the breath of people infected with the disease had high levels of virus in the first two days after an infection — a period when many antigen tests were negative.

The organizations involved said they were communicating their findings in advance of a peer-reviewed publication in the interests of public health, as many families may be planning to use antigen tests as a way of screening for illness before family gatherings.

“A negative rapid antigen test just before a meeting offers no guarantee to protect others, in particular when the person tested has recently been exposed to the virus,” said Emmanuel Andre, a microbiologist at KU Leuven, which conducted the research together with UZ Leuven, a university hospital, and IMEC, a microelectronics think-tank.

Scientists were already aware that exhaled particles are key in spreading the virus, but finding high levels of virus at the start of an infection was surprising and is a “first indication” the virus may be transmitted very early in an infection, Andre said.

“A negative antigen test should not replace self-isolation when the chance of developing the disease is high, such as during the first 7 days following a high-risk contact,” he said.

In their study, researchers took 58 people who had been in close proximity with someone who was infected, and tested them regularly over a two-week period with multiple types of tests.

Of the 58, 11 later developed COVID-19. However, during the first two days of their infection, antigen tests failed to detect it half the time. PCR tests obtained by nose swabs reliably detected the disease. The aerosol tests, which are a type of PCR test that works by collecting breath and testing it on a specialized silicon chip, showed high virus levels in breath as early as the first day after an infection.

(Reporting by Toby Sterling; Editing by Bernadette Baum)

Key Takeaways

  • Antigen tests may miss early COVID-19 infections.
  • High virus levels found in breath early in infection.
  • PCR tests are more reliable than antigen tests.
  • Negative antigen tests don't guarantee safety.
  • Self-isolation is advised after high-risk exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The article discusses the limitations of COVID-19 antigen tests and the findings of Belgian researchers on early virus detection.
Why are antigen tests unreliable?
Antigen tests often fail to detect COVID-19 in the first two days of infection, missing early virus presence in breath.
What do researchers recommend?
Researchers advise against relying solely on antigen tests and recommend self-isolation after high-risk exposure.

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category