Finance

Businessman Gupta refused permission to appeal in Trafigura nickel fraud lawsuit

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 26, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: April 2, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Protesters gather in London against the ban of Palestine Action - Global Banking & Finance Review
A large crowd of protesters in London rallies against the ban of Palestine Action, holding flags and placards. This image captures the tension during the protest where over 466 individuals were arrested by police, highlighting the ongoing conflict surrounding Palestine Action and its implications.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Indian businessman Prateek Gupta was refused permission by London's High Court on Thursday to appeal against a ruling that he defrauded commodities trader Trafigura over

Gupta Denied Appeal in Trafigura Nickel Fraud Case

LONDON, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Indian businessman Prateek Gupta was refused permission by London's High Court on Thursday to appeal against a ruling that he defrauded commodities trader Trafigura over fake nickel cargoes.

Geneva-based Trafigura alleged Gupta was the mastermind of a fraudulent "Ponzi scheme" in which he and his companies agreed to provide high-quality 99.8% pure nickel but delivered low-value or even worthless materials instead.

Allegations Against Gupta

Gupta accepted he did not deliver high-grade nickel cargoes but says Trafigura staff devised the scheme, something Trafigura's former head nickel trader Sokratis Oikonomou denied.

Judge Pushpinder Saini ruled last month that Trafigura was induced to enter into contracts "by false and fraudulent representations" made by Gupta and his companies.

The judge also said Trafigura's former employees, including Oikonomou, were "wholly innocent of any wrongdoing".

Court's Decision on Appeal

Gupta sought permission to appeal that ruling and was refused, but he can still apply directly to the Court of Appeal.

Trafigura's lawyer, Nathan Pillow, said at Thursday's hearing that Trafigura was owed about $140 million in interest on top of the $500 million principal debt. A Trafigura spokesperson said Gupta owed about $700 million plus legal costs.

"Trafigura intends to take steps to enforce the judgment and pursue recovery of the sums awarded," the spokesperson said.

Legal and Financial Implications

Gupta's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Gupta is subject to a worldwide freezing order over his assets and agreed to limit his living expenses under that order to 5,000 pounds ($6,763.50) a month, from 20,000 pounds a month.

Last year's trial, which concluded in December, was the culmination of events that began in November 2022, when Trafigura first received complaints about cargoes it had sold.

The discovery prompted Trafigura to carry out further inspections, book a $590 million charge and then sue Gupta and his companies in February 2023 for what it then described as "systematic fraud".

($1 = 0.7393 pounds)

(Reporting by Sam TobinEditing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise and David Goodman)

Key Takeaways

  • London’s High Court refused Prateek Gupta permission to appeal a ruling that he defrauded Trafigura over fake nickel cargoes.
  • Judge Pushpinder Saini had found Trafigura was induced by false and fraudulent representations from Gupta and his companies.
  • Trafigura says about $640 million is owed, including roughly $140 million in interest.
  • Former Trafigura staff, including Sokratis Oikonomou, were deemed wholly innocent of wrongdoing.
  • Gupta remains under a worldwide asset freeze; his allowed living expenses were reduced to £5,000 per month.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
London’s High Court refused Prateek Gupta permission to appeal a judgment finding he defrauded Trafigura in a fake nickel cargo scheme, keeping the prior ruling intact.
How much does Trafigura claim is owed?
Trafigura’s lawyer said the total is about $640 million, including roughly $140 million in interest, stemming from the fraudulent nickel trades.
What restrictions remain on Gupta’s assets?
He is subject to a worldwide freezing order. As part of that order, his living expenses were limited to £5,000 per month, down from £20,000.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category