Finance

Setback for Meta as court adviser backs EU regulators in data spat

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 26, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: April 2, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Setback for Meta as court adviser backs EU regulators in data spat
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

BRUSSELS, Feb 26 (Reuters) - An adviser to Europe's top court on Thursday backed Meta Platforms' fight against EU antitrust regulators over what the U.S. tech giant said were aberrant requests for

Meta Faces EU Court Setback in Antitrust Data Dispute

By Foo Yun Chee and Charlotte Van Campenhout

BRUSSELS, Feb 26 (Reuters) - An adviser to Europe's top court on Thursday sided with EU regulators demanding information regarding two antitrust investigations of Meta Platforms, in a setback for the U.S.-based social media company.

Meta's Legal Challenge Against EU Regulators

The case underscores the increasing tendency by companies to challenge the EU antitrust enforcer over what they say are disproportionate regulatory demands.

Meta had taken its case to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union, questioning EU demands related to its Facebook social network and online classified ads.

The court's Advocate General Athanasios Rantos said judges should dismiss Meta's appeal and uphold a lower tribunal's ruling that backed the European Commission, the EU's competition enforcer.

Court Adviser Supports EU's Broad Investigative Powers

"The Commission has broad powers of investigation which enable it to request all necessary information in order to carry out its tasks," he said in a non-binding opinion.

"The documents referred to by the applicant did not contain sensitive data and the Commission's access was subject to strict limits and safeguards, with no disproportionate interference with privacy," Rantos said.

Judges, who tend to follow the majority of such recommendations, will rule in the coming months.

Meta's Concerns Over Privacy and Data Requests

Meta had complained that EU demands included documents such as autopsy reports on family members, children's school reports, information about individuals and their families, and even security details.

While Meta's judicial challenge against the EU regulatory information demands was going on, regulators ended their investigation in 2024 by levying a 797.7 million euro ($941 million) fine.

The violations related to Meta tying its Facebook Marketplace online classified ads service to its personal social network Facebook and imposing unfair trading conditions on other online classified ads service providers.

The cases are C-496/23 P Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission (Facebook Marketplace) and C-497/23 P Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission (Facebook Data).

($1 = 0.8477 euros)

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Charlotte Van Campenhout and Bill Berkrot)

Key Takeaways

  • An EU Court of Justice adviser recommended dismissing Meta’s appeals over EU antitrust information requests.
  • The opinion concerns Facebook Data and Facebook Marketplace investigations into potential abuse of dominance.
  • The view is non-binding; CJEU judges will issue a final ruling in the coming months.
  • Earlier, the General Court (May 24, 2023) upheld the Commission’s search-term-based data requests and safeguards.
  • Cases referenced: C-496/23 P (Marketplace) and C-497/23 P (Facebook Data).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
An EU court adviser recommended dismissing Meta’s appeals against EU antitrust information requests related to Facebook Data and Facebook Marketplace.
Is the adviser’s opinion final?
No. Advocate General opinions are non-binding. CJEU judges typically follow them but will issue a final ruling in the coming months.
Which cases are involved?
The appeals are in cases C-496/23 P (Facebook Marketplace) and C-497/23 P (Facebook Data), following General Court judgments from May 24, 2023.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category