Headlines

Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 25, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Emma Farge GENEVA, March 25 (Reuters) - Gulf Arab states told the U.N. Human Rights Council on Wednesday they face an existential threat from Iran as they condemned Iranian attacks on their

Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN

Gulf States Warn UN of Iranian Threats Amid Escalating Conflict

By Emma Farge

Existential Threats and Regional Security Concerns

GENEVA, March 25 (Reuters) - Gulf Arab states told the U.N. Human Rights Council on Wednesday they face an existential threat from Iranian attacks on their infrastructure, which the U.N. rights chief said might constitute war crimes. 

The nearly month-long U.S.-Israeli war on Iran has sparked large-scale Iranian retaliation in the form of drone and missile strikes on energy and civilian infrastructure in Gulf countries, killing civilians and driving up oil prices. 

Statements from Gulf State Ambassadors

"We are seeing an existential threat to international and regional security. This aggressive approach is undermining international law and sovereignty," Kuwait's ambassador Naser Abdullah H. M. Alhayen told the Geneva-based council.

Other Gulf states said Iran's actions were designed to spread terror, with the United Arab Emirates' ambassador Jamal Jama al Musharakh denouncing Iran's "attempt to destabilise the international order through reckless adventures of expansionism." 

UN Council Response and Motions

Countries at the 47-member council adopted a motion by consensus condemning Iran's "unprovoked and deliberate" strikes, seeking reparations from Iran and asking the U.N. rights chief to monitor the situation, a document showed.

Iran’s Defense and International Reactions

Iran’s Position and Justifications

Iran defended its actions, saying more than 1,500 civilians had been killed in the U.S.-Israeli strikes so far. "We fight on behalf of all of you against an enemy that, if not restrained today, will be beyond containment tomorrow," said Iran's ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva Ali Bahreini, referring to Israel.

Iran, backed by China, will hold its own emergency session on a fatal strike on a primary school on Friday. 

UN Human Rights Chief’s Warning

The United Nations' top rights official Volker Turk urged states to end the Iran conflict, describing the situation as extremely dangerous and unpredictable. 

Potential War Crimes and Civilian Impact

"Attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure must end. If they are deliberate, such attacks may constitute war crimes," he told the council.

Broader Perspectives and Mediation Efforts

NGO and Mediator Responses

While Gulf states received strong backing in the council on Wednesday, the International Service for Human Rights, an independent NGO, warned against "selective outrage", calling instead for a focus on violations by all perpetrators.

Oman, which had served as a mediator between the United States and Iran before the conflict, was one of the few countries to acknowledge that U.S.-Israeli strikes had preceded Iran’s retaliatory attacks.

Consequences for Regional Stability and Economy

"(They were) the spark that ignited the escalation currently affecting the region and the consequences are threatening states and their vital economic interests and their security and stability," Ambassador Idris Abdul Rahman Al Khanjari told the council. 

(Reporting by Emma Farge; Additional reporting by Cecile Mantovani; Editing by Miranda Murray, William Maclean)

Key Takeaways

  • Multiple Gulf countries—Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE (and Jordan)—have been targeted by unprecedented Iranian missile and drone strikes since February 28, prompting Gulf states to describe the danger as existential (atlanticcouncil.org).
  • The U.N. Human Rights Council is set to vote on a motion condemning Iran’s actions, demanding reparations, and calling for monitoring by the U.N. rights chief Volker Türk, who warned deliberate attacks on civilians may be war crimes (ungeneva.org).
  • U.N. and global bodies are deeply concerned: A Bahrain-led U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Iran’s attacks passed on March 11; the U.N. rights chief underscored the unpredictable, dangerous scope of the conflict (ungeneva.org).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do Gulf states consider Iranian strikes an existential threat?
Gulf states cite attacks on energy and civilian infrastructure and rising tensions as major risks to their security and sovereignty.
What actions are the Gulf states taking at the UN?
They are pushing for a UN Human Rights Council motion condemning Iran's strikes, seeking reparations, and asking for ongoing monitoring.
How has the UN responded to the Iran conflict?
The UN rights chief called for an end to the conflict, warning it is unpredictable and could expand across borders.
What impact have Iranian strikes had on oil prices?
The strikes have led to increased oil prices due to attacks on energy infrastructure in the Gulf.
What justification does Iran give for its actions?
Iran claims it is retaliating after more than 1,500 civilians were killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category