Published by Gbaf News
Posted on May 23, 2017

Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.
Published by Gbaf News
Posted on May 23, 2017

By Michael Stanes, Investment Director at Heartwood Investment Management
Confidence in President Trump’s ability to execute his pro-growth agenda has further evaporated as more allegations have come to light around the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with the Kremlin in November’s election. Risk aversion took hold mid-week, with investors growing less optimistic that tax cuts, infrastructure spending and deregulation will be executed. The dollar has fallen by 6% on a trade-weighted basis from its post-election high set in December 2016.
Against the rising tide of political headlines, investors are determining whether the reaction to political events is just a temporary setback or if this unwind signals something more sinister. Headlines are fluid and it remains too early to draw any concrete conclusions about Trump’s political troubles. However, we would caution that the so-called ‘reflation trade’ was not solely premised on Trump’s ability to deliver significant fiscal easing, but also reflected the overall improvement in global economic conditions and fading disinflationary effects that began in the summer of 2016.
So far, our key takeaways are:
We recognise that we are in the latter part of the market cycle and sentiment is likely to remain vulnerable to pressure points as we move through the year. However, we are maintaining our modest overweight exposure to global equity markets, believing that the fundamental backdrop remains constructive for financial markets in the shorter term.
By Michael Stanes, Investment Director at Heartwood Investment Management
Confidence in President Trump’s ability to execute his pro-growth agenda has further evaporated as more allegations have come to light around the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with the Kremlin in November’s election. Risk aversion took hold mid-week, with investors growing less optimistic that tax cuts, infrastructure spending and deregulation will be executed. The dollar has fallen by 6% on a trade-weighted basis from its post-election high set in December 2016.
Against the rising tide of political headlines, investors are determining whether the reaction to political events is just a temporary setback or if this unwind signals something more sinister. Headlines are fluid and it remains too early to draw any concrete conclusions about Trump’s political troubles. However, we would caution that the so-called ‘reflation trade’ was not solely premised on Trump’s ability to deliver significant fiscal easing, but also reflected the overall improvement in global economic conditions and fading disinflationary effects that began in the summer of 2016.
So far, our key takeaways are:
We recognise that we are in the latter part of the market cycle and sentiment is likely to remain vulnerable to pressure points as we move through the year. However, we are maintaining our modest overweight exposure to global equity markets, believing that the fundamental backdrop remains constructive for financial markets in the shorter term.