Finance

Nuclear, onshore wind cheapest way to meet Sweden's electricity needs, OECD report says

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 4, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 2, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Nuclear, onshore wind cheapest way to meet Sweden's electricity needs, OECD report says
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

STOCKHOLM, March 4 (Reuters) - Expanding nuclear and onshore wind power is the cheapest way for Sweden to meet surging electricity demand, leaving no place for offshore wind, the OECD's Nuclear Energy

OECD: Nuclear and Onshore Wind Are Sweden's Cheapest Electricity Sources

Sweden's Energy Future: Nuclear and Onshore Wind Lead the Way

OECD Report Highlights Cost-Effective Solutions

STOCKHOLM, March 4 (Reuters) - Expanding nuclear and onshore wind power is the cheapest way for Sweden to meet surging electricity demand, leaving no place for offshore wind, the OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency said on Wednesday.

Sweden is aiming for net zero emissions by 2045. Electricity demand is expected to double as transport and industries such as steel shift to cleaner power.

Nuclear and Onshore Wind: The Leading Roles

"It is incontrovertible that both nuclear energy, including long-term operations and new build, and onshore wind will play the leading roles in any future least-cost capacity mix," the NEA said in the report.

Projected Capacity and Costs for 2050

In the NEA's base case for 2050, with an annual system cost of around $18 billion, Sweden has 13 gigawatts of installed nuclear power and 30 GW of onshore wind.

A similar system cost - covering generation, transmission, balancing and backup - could be achieved with 8 GW to 19 GW of nuclear energy, plus 10 GW to 55 GW of onshore wind.

Sweden currently has 7 GW of installed nuclear capacity and 17 GW of onshore wind, and only around 200 megawatts of offshore wind.

Offshore Wind: Limited Role for Now

If nuclear builds become more expensive or electricity imports cheaper, "there might be an opening for offshore wind to enter Sweden's optimal capacity mix", the report said. "For the time being, this is not the case."

Cost Comparison of Energy Sources

Onshore wind is the cheapest to build at around $1,500 per kilowatt, followed by offshore wind at $3,000 and nuclear at $7,000, the report said.

But nuclear reactors can produce round-the-clock electricity independent of the weather, reducing overall system costs, the NEA said.

Government Policy and Future Outlook

Sweden's right-of-centre government wants the equivalent of around 10 new, full-size reactors by 2045 to complement the six now in operation.

It has offered cheap loans and price guarantees to developers for 2,500 MW of new capacity. It has cut subsidies for offshore wind and rejected applications for sites off the Baltic coast.

Current Electricity Generation Mix

Sweden's electricity generation is already essentially fossil-free, with around 40% coming from hydro-electric power, 29% from nuclear, 21% from wind, 8% from thermal power and 2% from solar.

(Reporting by Simon Johnson. Editong by Mark Potter)

Key Takeaways

  • In the NEA's 2050 base case, Sweden achieves least‑cost system (~$18 billion/year) with ~13 GW nuclear and ~30 GW onshore wind; alternatives range from 8–19 GW nuclear plus 10–55 GW onshore wind to match costs.
  • Onshore wind has the lowest capital cost (~$1,500/kW), followed by offshore wind (~$3,000/kW) and nuclear (~$7,000/kW); nuclear’s value lies in its reliable 24/7 output, which reduces system costs.
  • Sweden’s current electricity mix is already highly clean—hydro ~40 %, nuclear ~29 %, wind ~21 %—and surging demand from electrification likely doubles needs by mid‑century.
  • Offshore wind remains excluded from the optimal mix unless nuclear cost rises significantly or electricity imports become notably cheaper.
  • Sweden’s government supports new nuclear builds—targeting ~10 new reactors by 2045—and has offered low‑cost loans and guarantees, while cutting subsidies and rejecting offshore wind sites to favor onshore alternatives.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the OECD report say about Sweden's energy mix?
The report states that nuclear and onshore wind are the cheapest ways for Sweden to meet its future electricity demand, with little room for offshore wind.
Why isn't offshore wind included in Sweden's cheapest options?
Offshore wind is currently more expensive than onshore wind and nuclear, so it's not part of the optimal capacity mix unless nuclear costs rise or imports become cheaper.
How much will Sweden's electricity demand grow by 2050?
Sweden's electricity demand is expected to double by 2050 as industry and transport transition to cleaner energy.
How much does it cost to build different energy sources in Sweden?
Onshore wind costs around $1,500 per kilowatt, offshore wind $3,000, and nuclear $7,000 per kilowatt.
What actions has Sweden's government taken to support nuclear energy?
The government is supporting nuclear development with cheap loans, price guarantees, and aims to add 10 new reactors by 2045.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category