Top Stories

Polish tribunal rules European rights court may not question judges

Published by Jessica Weisman-Pitts

Posted on March 10, 2022

2 min read

· Last updated: February 8, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Exterior view of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg related to Poland's judicial ruling - Global Banking & Finance Review
The image shows the European Court of Human Rights building in Strasbourg, highlighting the recent Polish tribunal ruling that limits ECHR's authority over judges in Poland, a topic central to ongoing legal tensions in Europe.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

WARSAW (Reuters) – A top Polish court ruled on Thursday that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) could not question the appointment of Polish judges, a verdict that may further strain Warsaw’s relations with Europe. In power since 2015, the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party has clashed with European institutions over issues from […]

WARSAW (Reuters) – A top Polish court ruled on Thursday that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) could not question the appointment of Polish judges, a verdict that may further strain Warsaw’s relations with Europe.

In power since 2015, the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party has clashed with European institutions over issues from judicial reforms and refugees to climate change and LGBT rights.

Yet it is now calling for European solidarity and EU funds to help deal with the influx of over 1.4 million refugees from Ukraine after a Russian invasion which started two weeks ago.

Critics accuse the PiS of trampling on European democratic values and politicising courts via appointments and disciplinary processes to entrench power. But the government says changes are needed to improve efficiency and clean up the judiciary of remnants of the 1945-89 communist era.

On Thursday, Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal said that the Strasbourg-based ECHR had no right to question the appointment of Polish judges.

“The ECHR does not have the right to modify the authentic text according to the judges’ own vision,” said judge Mariusz Muszynski, who himself was considered illegally appointed by the ECHR..

The Strasburg court has several dozen cases pending over appointments of Polish judges. In the past, it has also ruled against a Polish “disciplinary chamber” for lawyers.

“The Polish Constitutional Tribunal is now in line with the Russian Constitutional Court,” Adam Bodnar, former Human Rights Ombudsman wrote on Twitter, referring to the 2015 law allowing Russia’s court to decide whether or not to implement rulings of the ECHR.

Poland has ignored multiple past rulings by European bodies over its judiciary and other matters, saying they were illegal and politically-motivated interference.

Later this month, the Constitutional Tribunal is due to debate whether the EU’s Court of Justice may impose interim measures or financial penalties on Poland.

(Reporting by Anna Koper and Anna Wlodarczak-Semczuk; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)?
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is an international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights to adjudicate cases of human rights violations by member states.
What are judicial reforms?
Judicial reforms are changes made to the legal system or judiciary to improve its efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness, often aimed at enhancing the rule of law and access to justice.
What is the role of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland?
The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of laws and regulations, ensuring that they comply with the Polish Constitution.
What is the significance of judicial appointments?
Judicial appointments are significant as they determine who will interpret and apply the law, impacting the independence and integrity of the judiciary and the rule of law.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category