By Stephanie van den Berg THE HAGUE, Jan 30 (Reuters) - Rohingya survivors of the 2017 military crackdown in Myanmar expect the International Court of Justice, the United Nations' highest court, to
Rohingya Survivors Anticipate Genocide Ruling Against Myanmar
International Court's Role in Genocide Cases
By Stephanie van den Berg
Background of the Case
THE HAGUE, Jan 30 (Reuters) - Rohingya survivors of the 2017 military crackdown in Myanmar expect the International Court of Justice, the United Nations' highest court, to rule the country committed genocide against them, they said on Friday.
Survivors' Perspectives
A judgment is expected in three-to-six months' time following three weeks of hearings at the court in the Hague that is also known as the World Court.
Myanmar's Defense Arguments
The outcome of the case will have repercussions beyond Myanmar, including affecting South Africa’s genocide case at the court against Israel over the war in Gaza.
Implications of the Ruling
GAMBIA BROUGHT THE CASE
In their final submissions this week, lawyers for Gambia, a mainly Muslim country that brought the case, told the court that the only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from Myanmar's conduct is that it intended to destroy the Rohingya as a group.
Myanmar has denied accusations of genocide and said the 2017 offensive that forced at least 730,000 Rohingya from their homes and into neighbouring Bangladesh was a legitimate counterterrorist operation.
Speaking on Friday on the sidelines of a meeting of survivors of mass atrocities, Yousuf Ali, a 52-year-old Rohingya refugee who says he was tortured by the Myanmar military, said he believed the court would declare a genocide had been committed.
"The world has witnessed us suffering for so many years (... ) how we were deported, how our homes were destroyed and we were killed," he said.
A U.N. fact-finding mission concluded the offensive had included "genocidal acts" and survivors recounted killings, mass rape and arson.
At the international court, Myanmar's lawyers said the fact-finding mission was biased and that its conclusions did not have the standard of proof needed for a finding of genocide.
Gambia's Justice Minister Dawda Jallow asked the court to reject Myanmar's arguments and said a judgment declaring genocide would help to break Myanmar's "cycle of atrocities and impunities".
(Reporting by Stephanie van den Berg; editing by Barbara Lewis)
