Finance

Ruling in Prince Harry case against Daily Mail will take some time, UK judge says

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 31, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Ruling in Prince Harry case against Daily Mail will take some time, UK judge says
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - The judge overseeing the lawsuit brought by Prince Harry, singer Elton John and other high-profile figures against the publisher of the Daily Mail at London's High Court

Ruling in Prince Harry’s Daily Mail Lawsuit Will Take Time, UK Judge Says

Overview of the Prince Harry Daily Mail Lawsuit

LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - The judge overseeing the lawsuit brought by Prince Harry, singer Elton John and other high-profile figures against the publisher of the Daily Mail at London's High Court said on Tuesday it would take some time before he could deliver his ruling.

Background of the Case

The Duke of Sussex, 41, and six other claimants are suing Associated Newspapers for alleged widespread unlawful activities ranging from hacking voicemail messages, bugging landlines and obtaining private information by deception over more than two decades from the early 1990s.

The publisher rejects their case as being "preposterous smears".

Arguments Presented in Court

Claimants’ Allegations

During almost 10 weeks of argument, judge Matthew Nicklin has heard evidence from the claimants as well as numerous current and former senior journalists from Associated, which also publishes the Mail on Sunday.

David Sherborne, the lawyer for Harry and the other claimants, said there was a culture at Associated's titles where its journalists would use private investigators to carry out unlawful activities on their behalf.

"Any finding of unlawful activity is a disaster," Sherborne said in his concluding remarks.

Publisher’s Defense

The publisher's lawyer Antony White argued that there was no evidence to back up the allegations, the claimants' witnesses were unreliable, and the case against the papers was scattergun and part of a conspiracy by people with a grudge against the press.

Judge’s Statement and Next Steps

"The remaining task is, of course, now mine," Nicklin said at the end of the trial.

"Judgment will take some time. After a short break over Easter ... I will be working on the case and the judgment effectively full-time ... so I won't be doing anything else ... and I will be toiling away on the judgment."

(Reporting by Michael Holden and Sam Tobin; Editing by Alison Williams)

Key Takeaways

  • Judge Matthew Nicklin confirmed at the end of the nearly 10-week trial that judgment will take “some time,” and he will work full‑time on it after a short Easter break.
  • Claimants—including Prince Harry, Elton John and Elizabeth Hurley—allege Associated Newspapers committed decades-long unlawful practices like voicemail hacking, landline bugging and deceptive private investigations; the publisher rejects these as “preposterous smears.”
  • The trial, which began in early 2026 and involved extensive testimony from the claimants and Associated’s journalists, represents the final major press-intrusion case faced by Prince Harry, following prior cases against Mirror Group and News Group Newspapers.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is involved in the lawsuit against the Daily Mail?
Prince Harry, Elton John, and other high-profile figures are suing Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail.
What are the allegations against Associated Newspapers?
The lawsuit alleges unlawful activities such as hacking voicemail messages, bugging landlines, and obtaining private information by deception.
How long will it take for the judge to deliver a ruling?
The judge indicated that it will take some time before he can deliver his ruling, as he will be working full-time on the case after Easter.
What is Associated Newspapers' response to the allegations?
Associated Newspapers denies the claims, calling them 'preposterous smears' and arguing that there is no evidence to back up the allegations.
Who are the legal representatives in this case?
David Sherborne is the lawyer for the claimants, and Antony White represents Associated Newspapers in the legal proceedings.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category