Banking

StanChart fined $61.5 million for misreporting liquidity position

Published by maria gbaf

Posted on December 21, 2021

3 min read

· Last updated: January 28, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Mike Ashley, founder of Frasers, fails to secure a position on the Boohoo board - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image depicts Mike Ashley, founder of Frasers, who recently failed to win a seat on the Boohoo board. This development comes as the Bank of Japan maintains steady interest rates, highlighting the ongoing economic challenges in the finance sector.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Abhinav Ramnarayan LONDON (Reuters) -The Bank of England said on Monday it was fining Standard Chartered 46.55 million pounds ($61.51 million) for misreporting its liquidity position to the regulator and for failings in its controls. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) said the fine related to when the regulator was concerned from late 2017 about a “heightened […]

StanChart Fined $61.5M for Liquidity Reporting Errors

By Abhinav Ramnarayan

LONDON (Reuters) -The Bank of England said on Monday it was fining Standard Chartered 46.55 million pounds ($61.51 million) for misreporting its liquidity position to the regulator and for failings in its controls.

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) said the fine related to when the regulator was concerned from late 2017 about a “heightened risk” of U.S. dollar outflows from Standard Chartered and had placed additional liquidity requirements on the bank.

The fine is the highest ever imposed by the PRA in a case where it was the sole enforcer, it said in a statement.

The PRA said Standard Chartered made five errors reporting its liquidity metric between March 2018 and May 2019, meaning the regulator did not have a reliable overview of the bank‘s liquidity position.

Regulators monitor banks’ liquidity positions to ensure they have enough cash or cash-like assets if they suddenly face a large number of withdrawal requests.

“We expect firms to notify us promptly of any material issues with their regulatory reporting, which Standard Chartered failed to do in this case,” PRA chief executive Sam Woods said.

“Standard Chartered’s systems, controls and oversight fell significantly below the standards we expect of a systemically important bank,” he said.

The fine will be a blow to Chief Executive Bill Winters, who at the time the errors happened was trying to overhaul the lender’s risk and compliance culture.

Standard Chartered said it accepted the PRA’s findings.

“These errors did not affect Standard Chartered’s overall liquidity position, which remained in surplus throughout the period,” it said in a statement.

“Standard Chartered … has made significant improvements to and substantial investment in its liquidity and regulatory reporting processes and controls and remains committed to accurate regulatory reporting”.

The PRA said that one of Standard Chartered’s errors resulted in an overreporting of the lender’s “US dollar Gap 2 Metric” by $7.9 billion. It said correcting for the errors would have meant there were around 40 days when Standard Chartered fell short of the PRA’s liquitidy expectations.

In a rare insight into the PRA’s dealings with banks, the regulator said one error arose because a cell in a spreadsheet used for liquidity reporting had a positive value when a zero or negative value was expected

Standard Chartered notified the PRA of this error on 1 April 2019, over four months after it was identified.

Another mistake saw the bank report its holdings of U.S. asset-backed mortgage securities securities based on their notional value rather than their carrying value, resulting in an overreporting of approximately $2.5 billion.

The PRA said Standard Chartered’s co-operation in its probe meant the fine was reduced by 30% from 66.5 million pounds.

It also said Standard Chartered’s overall liquidity position was above its core liquidity requirement throughout the period.

($1 = 0.7568 pounds)

(Reporting by Abhinav Ramnarayan;Additional reporting by Rachel Armstrong, Editing by Angus MacSwan)

Key Takeaways

  • StanChart fined $61.5M for liquidity misreporting.
  • Errors occurred between March 2018 and May 2019.
  • PRA imposed the highest fine as sole enforcer.
  • StanChart's liquidity position remained in surplus.
  • Bank has improved its regulatory reporting processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The article discusses a $61.5 million fine imposed on Standard Chartered by the Bank of England for misreporting its liquidity position.
Why was StanChart fined?
StanChart was fined for making errors in reporting its liquidity metrics, which led to unreliable data for the regulator.
What was the impact of the errors?
Despite the errors, StanChart maintained a surplus liquidity position, but the fine highlights significant compliance failures.

Related Articles

More from Banking

Explore more articles in the Banking category