WASHINGTON, March 3 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the U.S. military had been successful against many Iranian naval and air targets, saying "just about everything has been
Trump, Rubio offer conflicting reasons for US entry into Iran war
Conflicting Accounts and Political Fallout
By Nandita Bose, Steve Holland and Nathan Layne
WASHINGTON, March 3 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he ordered U.S. forces to join Israel's attack on Iran because he believed Iran was about to strike first, contradicting the rationale offered a day earlier by his secretary of state for how the war began.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on Monday that the U.S. launched the attack because of fears that Iran would retaliate in response to planned Israeli action against Tehran.
Rubio's Explanation for the Attack
"We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action; we knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties," Rubio said.
Trump's Rationale and Administration Response
Trump rejected suggestions that Israel pushed the U.S. into the conflict, as his administration gave varying accounts and faced criticism from some supporters and Democrats who accused him of launching a "war of choice."
"I might have forced their (Israel’s) hand," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as he met with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that."
Iran has said the U.S. assault was unprovoked.
Conservative Criticism and Political Implications
Several prominent conservative commentators ratcheted up their criticism of the Iran attacks, arguing Rubio's comments indicated that Israel, not the Trump administration, was calling the shots.
"So he's flat out telling us that we're in a war with Iran because Israel forced our hand," conservative podcaster Matt Walsh wrote of Rubio to his 4 million followers on X. "This is basically the worst possible thing he could have said."
Megyn Kelly, a conservative podcaster, told her audience that she had doubts about Trump's decision to strike Iran.
"Our government's job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It's to look out for us. And this feels very much to me like it is clearly Israel's war," Kelly said in remarks aired prior to Rubio's comments.
The criticism from Trump's right flank comes as his Republican Party is fighting to hold on to control of the U.S. Congress in November midterm elections.
DAMAGE CONTROL
White House Response and Media Engagement
The debate over the run-up to the war has forced the White House into damage control.
Trump on Tuesday took questions from reporters in a public setting for the first time since the U.S.-Israeli air war began three days earlier. He previously discussed the attacks in two videos, one-on-one interviews with select journalists and brief remarks on Monday at the White House.
The president said he believed Iran was on the brink of launching attacks, presenting no evidence to support his view, after U.S. negotiations with Iran last Thursday in Geneva. Iran had described those talks as positive with more planned in the days ahead.
"It's something that had to be done," said Trump, who did not make a detailed case for war against Iran before it began.
Rubio's Follow-up and Administration Briefings
Rubio, pressed on Tuesday about his prior comment during a visit to Capitol Hill, told reporters: "The bottom line is this: The president determined we were not going to get hit first. It’s that simple, guys.”
Two senior Trump administration officials held a conference call on Tuesday with reporters to describe events leading up to military operations, in particular the Geneva talks with Iranian officials held by U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and mediated by Oman.
The two officials said Witkoff and Kushner repeatedly pressed Iran to give up uranium enrichment. Instead, Iran presented a plan that would allow the Iranians to enrich uranium at higher percentages at the Tehran Research Reactor in northern Iran, they said.
The U.S. envoys felt the Iranians were engaging in delay tactics, according to the officials.
"They were unwilling to give up the building blocks of what they needed to preserve in order to get to a (nuclear) bomb," one official said.
Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon.
Outcome of Negotiations and Military Action
The envoys reported back to Trump, telling him it might have been possible to get a nuclear agreement similar to the one that former President Barack Obama's team and world powers negotiated with Iran in 2015 but that it would take months.
Trump ordered U.S. forces into action the next day, and the strikes began on Saturday.
(Reporting by Nandita Bose, Steve Holland and Nathan Layne; Additional reporting by Michael Martina and Andreas RinkeEditing by Colleen Jenkins, Alistair Bell and Lisa Shumaker)
