Top Stories

U.S. appeals court upholds FAA rules on drone identification

Published by Jessica Weisman-Pitts

Posted on July 29, 2022

2 min read

· Last updated: February 5, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
FAA warning sign against civilian drone use, highlighting regulations on drone identification - Global Banking & Finance Review
Image of a FAA sign warning about civilian drone regulations, emphasizing the importance of Remote ID rules upheld by the U.S. Appeals Court for safe drone operation in U.S. airspace.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. Appeals Court on Friday upheld rules set by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requiring drones to have remote identification technology to enable them to be identified from the ground. The rules, which were finalized in April 2021, give drone manufacturers 18 months to begin producing drones with […]

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. Appeals Court on Friday upheld rules set by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requiring drones to have remote identification technology to enable them to be identified from the ground.

The rules, which were finalized in April 2021, give drone manufacturers 18 months to begin producing drones with so-called Remote ID and are aimed at safely managing the growing use of drones in U.S. airspace.

The U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia turned away a legal challenge from a drone operator and others who argued the rule “amounts to constant, warrantless governmental surveillance.”

The drone identification rules require they broadcast remote ID messages via radio frequency broadcast but eliminated proposed earlier requirements drones be connected to the internet to transmit location data. The FAA compares Remote ID to a “digital license plate” and says it is only detectable when the drone is in the air.

Judge Cornelia Pillard writing for the unanimous 3-0 panel said “Drones are coming. Lots of them. They are fun and useful. But their ability to pry, spy, crash, and drop things poses real risks. Free-for-all drone use threatens air traffic, people and things on the ground, and even national security.”

That concern prompted Congress in 2016 to direct the FAA to write rules on drone identification, Pillard noted.

She rejected arguments it was tantamount to illegal surveillance. “Requiring a drone to show its location and that of its operator while the drone is aloft in the open air violates no reasonable expectation of privacy,” Pillard wrote.

Separately, Senators Gary Peters, who chairs the Homeland Security Committee, and Republican Ron Johnson, Friday introduced legislation to boost U.S. government authority to counter drone threats.

Congress in 2018 expanded Justice Department and Homeland Security Department authority to disable or destroy threatening drones. The bill would renew that authority set to expire in October and extend powers to destroy or disable threatening drones to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for airports.

DHS official Samantha Vinograd said this month that since 2021, the TSA “reported nearly 2,000 drone sightings near U.S. airports, including incursions at major airports nearly every day.” A drone sighting near Washington National Airport last week briefly caused a halt to flights.

(Reporting by David Shepardson; additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Alistair Bell)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Remote ID?
Remote ID is a technology that allows drones to broadcast their identification and location to ground-based receivers, similar to a digital license plate, enhancing safety and accountability in airspace.
What is a U.S. Appeals Court?
A U.S. Appeals Court is a court that hears appeals from lower courts, reviewing decisions to ensure the law was applied correctly and justice was served.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category