Finance

Ukrainian steelmaker Metinvest exploring bond sale as debt deadline nears

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 24, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 2, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Moldovan anti-government protests funded by Ilan Shor - Global Banking & Finance Review
The image illustrates the ongoing anti-government protests in Moldova, where fugitive tycoon Ilan Shor offers $3,000 monthly to participants. This controversial move aims to destabilize the pro-European government ahead of elections.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Ukrainian steel giant Metinvest is exploring whether it could issue new debt to cover a near $430 million bond payment due in April that it has also been in talks to

Metinvest Weighs Bond Issue as $428 Million Payment Approaches

LONDON, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Ukrainian steel giant Metinvest is exploring whether it could issue new debt to cover a near $430 million bond payment due in April that it has also been in talks to potentially restructure, its chief executive has told Reuters.

Metinvest remains Ukraine's largest private company, but the country's four punishing years of war with Russia has seen it lose roughly half of its operations, including some of its biggest steel and coal facilities.

Refinancing Options and Market Context

Earlier this month, it paused talks with a group of its bondholders about restructuring $1.25 billion of its debt, saying it would explore "alternative liability management transactions".

Speaking to Reuters about Tuesday's four-year anniversary of the war, Metinvest CEO Yuriy Ryzhenkov laid out the impact the conflict has had and the options for its finances.

Bond Issuance Scenarios

He said it was looking at "many avenues", especially after poultry giant MHP last month became the first Ukrainian company since the full-scale war broke out in 2022 to sell an international bond.

"At the moment we're listening to what the market is saying, what they (investors) can be comfortable with," Ryzhenkov told Reuters by phone.

3- vs 5-year Tenor

"We would be comfortable to go with a 3-year bond, we would be comfortable to go with a 5-year. It obviously depends on the other details, on the covenants and the cost of the debt. So we'll have to strike some sort of a balance."

ACCEPTABLE COST?

Pricing Versus MHP Benchmark

Bankers say Metinvest would probably have to pay 1-2 percentage points more than the 10.5% MHP paid last month to borrow $450 million over three years.

Is the Cost Sustainable?

That would be a high price and not sustainable in the long term, Alan Siow, Co-Head of EM Corporate Debt at Ninety One said. But it would mean the firm retains market access and could then refinance at a better level if and when the situation improves.

Alternative Funding Routes

Ryzhenkov said Metinvest's other possibilities included a private debt deal, using the firm's existing resources, or going back to the restructuring options discussed in recent months.

Using Cash on Hand

If it did opt for a bond, Ryzhenkov added there was leeway on how much it would need to borrow. It has a $428 million payment to make by April 23, but has got some cash it could utilise.

Potential Size: $300m–$500m

"Depending on the conditions from the market, we can go for $300 million (bond) or we can go for $500 if the conversations are good, if the cost is acceptable."

Deutsche Bank Roadshow

Investor Outreach and Timeline

A spokesperson for Deutsche Bank, which helped organise a recent roadshow with Metinvest investors, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the potential for a bond sale.

Decision Window and Fallback

Ryzhenkov said Metinvest still had some time before a decision needed to be taken and that he was taking an optimistic view.

"Either we find the market solution which will basically resolve everything, or we will have an agreement with our creditors (to reprofile the bond)," he said.

(Reporting by Marc Jones; Editing by Toby Chopra)

Key Takeaways

  • Metinvest is evaluating a new bond issue to help meet a $428m payment due April 23.
  • The firm paused restructuring talks on $1.25bn of debt to explore alternative options.
  • Management is considering 3- or 5-year bonds, private debt, or using internal cash.
  • Pricing could exceed recent Ukrainian corporate deals, reflecting market risk.
  • Maintaining market access now could enable cheaper refinancing if conditions improve.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
Metinvest is considering issuing new debt or other financing to cover a $428m bond payment due April 23 after pausing restructuring talks with creditors.
What alternatives is Metinvest evaluating?
Options include a public bond sale of 3–5 years, a private debt deal, using cash on hand, or returning to a restructuring agreement with bondholders.
How might the potential bond be priced?
Bankers expect pricing above MHP’s recent 10.5% three-year deal, implying a high but potentially temporary cost to preserve market access.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category