Top Stories

UK’s Rwanda plan for asylum seekers could cost more than 600 million pounds

Published by Uma Rajagopal

Posted on March 1, 2024

3 min read

· Last updated: January 30, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Asylum seekers and Rwanda plan impact analysis - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image highlights the financial implications of the UK's Rwanda plan for asylum seekers, which could exceed 600 million pounds. The article discusses the controversial policy and its potential costs.
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

UK’s Rwanda plan for asylum seekers could cost more than 600 million pounds By Andrew MacAskill LONDON (Reuters) – The British government’s controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda might end up costing more than 600 million pounds to deport 300 refugees, parliament’s spending watchdog said on Friday. Under the policy first announced in […]

UK’s Rwanda plan for asylum seekers could cost more than 600 million pounds

By Andrew MacAskill

LONDON (Reuters) – The British government’s controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda might end up costing more than 600 million pounds to deport 300 refugees, parliament’s spending watchdog said on Friday.

Under the policy first announced in 2022, asylum seekers who arrive on England’s southern coast in small, inflatable boats would be sent to Rwanda, but so far no one has been deported because of ongoing legal challenges.

Ultimately, the government envisages sending thousands of people to the East African nation although it is unclear what the capacity would be.

On top of the 220 million pounds Britain has already paid Rwanda, the government has agreed to pay an extra 150 million pounds over the next three years, and 120 million pounds once the first 300 asylum seekers have been resettled, the National Audit Office (NAO) said on Friday.

The British government will also have to pay Rwanda a further 150,874 pounds to cover costs for each individual resettled, the spending watchdog said in the most detailed financial assessment of the policy so far.

When other costs such as flights are taken into account, the policy would come to more than 600 million pounds ($760 million).

The NAO said the government could activate a break clause that would take effect after three months, but previous payments to Rwanda would not be recoverable, and the government would have to honour future payments associated with relocated individuals.

The spending watchdog said the government had acknowledged it was a “high-risk and novel policy”, and the final cost would depend on the number of individuals deported.

Last year, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled the scheme was unlawful as it would violate British and international human rights laws because of inadequacies in the Rwandan system.

Despite the court’s ruling and the mounting cost, Sunak has pledged to press on, and in an effort to block further legal challenges the government is pushing legislation through parliament to declare Rwanda a safe country.

Sunak has invested huge amounts of political capital in the policy and hopes if deportation flights leave before an election expected later this year, it will boost his Conservative Party which is trailing badly in opinion polls.

Many asylum seekers who arrive in Britain on the small boats say they are fleeing wars and abuse from the Middle East, Africa and South Asia, and most are given refugee status.

But the British government says about 90% making the journey are men, and many of them economic migrants rather than genuine refugees. So far this year, 2,255 asylum seekers have arrived in Britain on small boats.

($1 = 0.7898 pounds)

(Reporting by Andrew MacAskill and Michael Holden ; Editing by Jan Harvey)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a break clause?
A break clause is a provision in a contract that allows one or both parties to terminate the agreement before its natural expiration date, often under specified conditions.
What is the UK Supreme Court?
The UK Supreme Court is the highest court in the United Kingdom, which hears appeals on important legal issues and interprets laws, including those related to human rights.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category