Finance

UN adopts Ghana's slavery resolution, defying resistance from US, Europe

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 25, 2026

4 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
UN adopts Ghana's slavery resolution, defying resistance from US, Europe
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Catarina Demony March 25 (Reuters) - A resolution proposed by Ghana at the United Nations on Wednesday to recognise transatlantic slavery as the "gravest crime against humanity" and calling for

UN Adopts Ghana's Resolution Calling Slavery a Crime Against Humanity, Urging Reparations

UN Resolution on Transatlantic Slavery: Adoption, Reactions, and Implications

By Catarina Demony

Adoption of the Resolution

March 25 (Reuters) - A resolution proposed by Ghana at the United Nations on Wednesday to recognise transatlantic slavery as the "gravest crime against humanity" and calling for reparations has been adopted despite resistance from Europe and the U.S.

Ghana said the resolution was needed because the consequences of slavery, which saw at least 12.5 million Africans taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries, persist today, including racial disparities.

At a U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) vote, 123 countries supported the resolution, which is not legally binding but carries political weight, while three opposed it, including the U.S. and Israel, and 52 abstained, including the European Union and Britain.

Ghana's foreign minister, Samuel Ablakwa, said the resolution called for accountability.

Justin Hansford, a law professor at Howard University, said the resolution was significant as it represented the furthest the U.N. has gone in recognising transatlantic slavery as a crime against humanity and in calling for reparations.

"This marks the first vote on the floor of the U.N.," Hansford said. "I cannot overemphasise how large of a step that is."

Resolution Calls for Apologies and Compensation

UN and African Leaders' Perspectives

RESOLUTION CALLS FOR APOLOGIES, COMPENSATION

U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the UNGA that "far bolder action" was required from more states to confront historical injustices. The Netherlands remains the only European country to have issued a formal apology for its role in slavery.

The resolution marks a new step in Africa's efforts to seek accountability for historical injustices by former colonial powers after the African Union last year set out to create a "unified vision" among its 55 member states on what reparations may look like.

It urges member states to engage in dialogue on reparations, including issuing formal apologies, returning stolen artefacts, providing financial compensation, and ensuring guarantees of non-repetition.

Growing Momentum and Backlash

While longstanding calls for reparations have gained momentum in recent years, there is also a growing backlash.

Several Western leaders have opposed even discussing the subject, with critics arguing today's states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical wrongs.

International Concerns and Criticisms

EU and US Objections

EU RAISES 'LEGAL AND FACTUAL' CONCERNS

Both the EU and the U.S. voiced concerns the resolution could imply a hierarchy among crimes against humanity, treating some as more serious than others.

Historian Babatunde Mesewaku, speaking in Badagry, a coastal town in Nigeria that served as a major slavery port, said that, in his view, it was the gravest crime against humanity, given its length of over 500 years, the tens of millions who were taken - along with those who died in the Middle Passage - resulting in the destruction and stagnation in Africa and beyond.

U.S. representative Dan Negrea said his country objected to the "cynical usage of historical wrongs as a leverage point ... to reallocate modern resources to people and nations who are distantly related to the historical victims."

The EU representative, Gabriella Michaelidou, said the bloc would have supported a resolution highlighting the "scale of the atrocity" but raised "legal and factual" concerns, including applying international law retroactively.

Criticism of Ghana's Domestic Policies

Ghana has also faced criticism for advocating justice for past wrongs on the world stage while simultaneously pushing for stricter anti-LGBT laws at home.

Future Steps and Reparations Framework

African and Caribbean Initiatives

African and Caribbean nations have been seeking to establish a special U.N. reparations tribunal, and Ablakwa said the resolution could pave the way for a "reparative framework."

Historical Accountability and Justice

"History does not disappear when ignored, truth does not weaken when delayed, crime does not rot... and justice does not expire with time," Ablakwa said.

(Reporting by Catarina Demony in London; Additional reporting by David Brunnstrom in Washington and Kazeem Sanni in Lagos; Editing by Nick Zieminski and Aurora Ellis)

Key Takeaways

  • Broad political support: 123 countries backed the resolution, highlighting growing international recognition of the enduring legacy of the transatlantic slave trade (apnews.com).
  • Calls for reparatory justice: The resolution urges formal apologies, financial compensation, restitution of cultural artefacts, and educational initiatives (apnews.com).
  • Controversy with U.S. and EU: The U.S., Israel, and Argentina opposed, while the EU and UK abstained, citing concerns over retroactive law and hierarchy of atrocity crimes (apnews.com).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the UN resolution proposed by Ghana address?
The resolution recognized transatlantic slavery as the gravest crime against humanity and called for reparations, including formal apologies and financial compensation.
Which countries opposed Ghana's slavery resolution at the UN?
The United States, Israel, and one other country opposed the resolution, while the European Union and Britain abstained.
What actions does the resolution urge member states to take?
It urges dialogue on reparations, formal apologies, returning stolen artefacts, financial compensation, and guarantees of non-repetition.
Why did the US and EU resist the UN slavery resolution?
They raised legal and factual concerns, including issues about creating a hierarchy among crimes against humanity and applying international law retroactively.
How significant is this UN slavery resolution?
It's the furthest the UN has gone in recognizing transatlantic slavery as a crime against humanity and in calling for reparations, making it a major milestone.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category