Finance

Unilever sued for defamation by ousted chair of Ben & Jerry's board

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 26, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Unilever sued for defamation by ousted chair of Ben & Jerry's board
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

March 26 (Reuters) - Unilever  and its recently spun off Magnum ice cream unit were sued for defamation on Thursday by Anuradha Mittal, who was ousted in December as chair of Ben & Jerry's independent

Ousted Ben & Jerry's board chair sues Unilever, alleging defamation

Defamation Lawsuit Intensifies Ben & Jerry's and Unilever Dispute

By Jonathan Stempel

March 26 (Reuters) - Unilever and its recently spun-off Magnum ice cream unit were sued for defamation on Thursday by Anuradha Mittal, who was ousted in December as chair of Ben & Jerry's independent board, saying the companies vilified and discredited her for supporting Palestinian rights.

Background of the Legal Dispute

The lawsuit escalates a years-long dispute over what Ben & Jerry's and its board say were Unilever's efforts to undermine their autonomy and the brand's social mission, including by removing former Ben & Jerry's Chief Executive Dave Stever.

Unilever did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Magnum said in an email: "The claims are unfounded and we are confident the court process will show this."

Details of the Defamation Claims

In a complaint filed in the Oakland, California, federal court, Mittal said her support for Palestinian rights and a ceasefire in Gaza "rankled" Unilever, with the acrimony escalating after Unilever announced the Magnum spinoff in March 2024.

She said the defamation included claims she engaged in self-dealing, received improper benefits, diverted funds from the nonprofit Ben & Jerry's Foundation, created a toxic work environment, and was unfit to remain board chair following internal investigations.

“Defendants achieved their goal of thoroughly humiliating and discrediting Ms. Mittal,” harming her reputation and causing depression and chronic insomnia, the complaint said.

Unilever retained a 19.9% stake in Magnum following the December spinoff.

The Unraveling of a Four-Decade Relationship

Mittal's Response and Damages Sought

FOUR-DECADE RELATIONSHIP UNRAVELED

Mittal is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. She said Unilever and Magnum acted with “actual malice,” meaning they knew their statements were false or had reckless disregard for their truth.

Mittal's Background and Advocacy

Raised in Kanpur, India, Mittal is the founder and executive director of the Oakland Institute, a think tank focused on the rights of farmers, forest dwellers, indigenous communities and "pastoralists."

Ben & Jerry's Social Mission and Legal Actions

Ben & Jerry's has had a socially conscious mission since its 1978 founding by Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, and was acquired by Unilever in 2000.

The relationship began unraveling in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's said it would stop selling ice cream in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Ben & Jerry’s sued Unilever in November 2024 to stop alleged efforts to dismantle its board and end its progressive social activism, which has also included attempts to criticize U.S. President Donald Trump.

That lawsuit remains pending, and the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation obtained court permission last week to join as a plaintiff.

Magnum's Position on the Litigation

Magnum has called the litigation “regrettable” and said it was committed to supporting Ben & Jerry's.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Chris Reese)

Key Takeaways

  • Mittal was removed in late 2025 amid governance changes by Magnum, following long‑running disputes over Ben & Jerry’s social mission and independence (bostonglobe.com)
  • She alleges that Unilever/Magnum threatened defamatory statements if she didn’t resign, part of a broader effort to undermine the independent board's authority (en.wikipedia.org)
  • This lawsuit adds to prior litigation—since 2024 the board has sued Unilever, accusing it of censoring its support for Gaza ceasefires, Palestinian refugees and other political stances (apnews.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Who filed a defamation lawsuit against Unilever?
Anuradha Mittal, the ousted chair of Ben & Jerry's independent board, filed the lawsuit.
Why did Anuradha Mittal sue Unilever and its Magnum spin off?
Mittal accused them of defamation for allegedly vilifying her due to her public support for Palestinian rights.
Where was the defamation lawsuit filed?
The lawsuit was filed in the federal court in Oakland, California.
When was Anuradha Mittal ousted from Ben & Jerry's board?
She was ousted in December.
What prompted the alleged defamation campaign against Mittal?
Her public support for Palestinian rights and a ceasefire in Gaza reportedly prompted the campaign.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category