Vanuatu's golden passport scheme affects EU visa policies - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image illustrates the EU's decision to revoke Vanuatu's visa-free travel agreement due to concerns over its golden passport scheme, highlighting implications for global finance and security.
Business

Union faults BP’s proposals in local refinery negotiations

Published by maria gbaf

Posted on January 24, 2022

2 min read

· Last updated: January 28, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Union Criticizes BP's Local Refinery Negotiation Proposals

HOUSTON (Reuters) – The United Steelworkers union (USW) on Friday said proposals by energy giant BP Plc would undermine its 56-year-old national program for refinery and chemical plant worker contracts.

People in the USW familiar with the matter said BP has put forward proposals in local negotiations at its U.S. refineries to require waiting periods of up to 120 days between the expiration of a contract and the possible start of a strike.

“BP’s position at local tables attacks the National Oil Bargaining Program,” the union said in a message to members and seen by Reuters. “Pipeline & refinery locals stand together to fight back!”

A BP spokesperson declined to discuss the details of proposals in contract negotiations.

“BP is negotiating in good faith with the United Steelworkers union to improve the competitiveness of our business and create a sustainable future for all,” said company spokesperson Cameron Nazminia.

A union spokesperson was not immediately available to discuss the USW’s message.

Since 1966 the union has at many refineries won a common expiration date for refinery and chemical plant contracts. The common date raises the possibility workers will strike at multiple plants simultaneously, as happened in 2015, during the last nationwide strike.

“We’re standing the line,” said a union source, who described the BP proposals as taking refineries off the common contract expiration date, allowing the company to “influence the contract behind the scenes.”

While not changing the formal expiration date, the 120-day no strike period changes the date in practice, potentially reducing the power of collective action available to the USW with a common expiration date.

One company that has used no-strike or so-called labor peace periods is Exxon Mobil Corp, which locked out 650 workers at its Beaumont, Texas, refinery nearly nine months ago, following a 75-day no-strike period.

“We don’t believe Exxon is the best example to follow,” a union source said.

The USW is negotiating a new national agreement for 30,000 U.S. refinery and chemical plant workers with Marathon Petroleum Corp, the industry’s lead negotiator.

At the same time, USW local unions are negotiating site-specific issues with plant managers.

(Reporting by Erwin Seba; Editing by William Mallard)

Key Takeaways

  • BP's proposals could undermine USW's national program.
  • USW criticizes BP's 120-day no-strike period proposal.
  • BP aims to improve business competitiveness through negotiations.
  • USW seeks a common expiration date for contracts.
  • Exxon's labor peace periods cited as a negative example.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The article discusses BP's refinery negotiation proposals and the USW union's criticism of these proposals.
What are BP's proposals?
BP proposed a 120-day no-strike period, which the USW claims undermines their national program.
Who is involved in the negotiations?
The negotiations involve BP, the United Steelworkers union, and Marathon Petroleum Corp as the industry's lead negotiator.

Related Articles

More from Business

Explore more articles in the Business category