Finance

WTO reform talks face U.S.-India wall in Cameroon, diplomats say

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 27, 2026

4 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
WTO reform talks face U.S.-India wall in Cameroon, diplomats say
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Olivia Le Poidevin GENEVA, March 27 (Reuters) - Large differences remain between most countries and the U.S. and India as trade ministers meet to discuss reforms at the World Trade Organization,

WTO reform talks face U.S.-India wall in Cameroon, diplomats say

Major Sticking Points and Negotiation Dynamics at WTO Reform Talks

By Olivia Le Poidevin

Background: WTO at a Crossroads

YAOUNDE, March 27 (Reuters) - Large differences remain between most countries and the U.S. and India as trade ministers meet to discuss reforms at the World Trade Organization, two diplomats told Reuters on Friday.

The ministers are meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, as the organisation faces a critical test to its future amid a year of tariff-fuelled trade turmoil and major disruption to shipping, energy prices and supply chains due to the Middle East conflict.

Key Obstacles: U.S. and India Positions

Diplomatic Perspectives

"There is a real commitment among ministers to reach an agreement on reforms, but there is a big elephant in the room blocking: India and the U.S.," a senior diplomat told Reuters.

Another diplomat from an African country said India so far has not shown signs of a change in position. Some flexibility, however, might be possible, the person added. The diplomats declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the negotiations.

Resistance to Reform Proposals

While the U.S. and India acknowledge the need to reform the global trading system, they have resisted proposals of a substantive workplan on reforms.

"Unfortunately on reform I don't see much room for manoeuvre between the U.S. and India's positions," said the senior diplomat.

Specific Points of Contention

India has also opposed an agreement to aid investment into developing countries and the U.S. desire to permanently extend an e-commerce moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions ​like digital downloads, which ⁠expires this month.

"The U.S., China, EU and UK positions are reasonable, but there is one party that we need to see compromise from to make progress - India," said Chris Southworth, the Secretary General of the UK International Chamber of Commerce

"I think frustration among members will start to spillover here in Yaounde if we see no progress."

International Reactions and Broader Implications

The European Union and parties to the Comprehensive and ‌Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership said the WTO needs deep reform and is at a "critical juncture." The CPTTP is a trade deal encompassing 12 countries including Japan, Britain, Canada, Mexico, Australia and Malaysia.

India's Position and Concerns

E-Commerce Moratorium Debate

INDIA'S POSITION

India's Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal has cast doubt on U.S. efforts to extend the e-commerce moratorium, saying it warranted a "careful reconsideration". India is concerned about a ​loss of tariff revenue.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Thursday Washington was not interested in a temporary extension to the ban, only a permanent one.

Consensus vs. Plurilateral Decisions

Goyal has also challenged moves by the EU, U.S., Canada and others for a subset of members to take decisions plurilaterally, saying any outcome should be agreed by consensus.

That has cast a shadow over whether an Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement to encourage foreign direct investment in developing and least-developed countries can be incorporated into the WTO rule book in Yaounde.

Turkey on Thursday lifted its opposition to it.

India's Rationale for Its Stance

Goyal's position showed India wants to protect the WTO's core architecture, said Ajay Srivastava, founder of think tank Global Trade Research Initiative and a former Indian negotiator.

"Together, these risk turning the WTO from a rules-based body into one driven by power and selective coalitions," he said.

Public Stock Holding and Food Security

There is also deadlock over one of New Delhi's key priorities: a permanent solution on public stock holding to allow developing countries to give subsidies to rice and wheat farmers through a price support mechanism.

Big agricultural exporters like the U.S., EU and Australia fear it would let countries like India build large stocks of foodstuffs and dispose surpluses, potentially distorting trade.

Randa Sengupta, a senior researcher at think tank, the Third World Network, said PSH was important for supporting farmers and enabling food security for poorer communities in India.

Prospects for Progress

Constructive Talks and Possible Outcomes

'CONSTRUCTIVE' TALKS

Still, a concrete reform workplan was within reach, Norway's Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide told Reuters.

"People are beginning to engage in the real questions," he said, pointing to talks on the WTO's Most Favored Nation principle to treat states equally, while allowing exceptions to national security.

Similarly, Britain's Business Secretary Peter Kyle said a text on reforms was emerging and that constructive talks were taking place to ensure broad agreement.

Reporting Credits

(Reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin in Yaounde, additional reporting by Manoj Kumar in New Delhi; Editing by Arun Koyyur)

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. and India are central obstacles to agreeing a substantive WTO reform workplan ahead of MC14 in Yaoundé, with resistance on both investment facilitation and a permanent e‑commerce moratorium (finance.yahoo.com).
  • A draft Yaoundé Ministerial Statement and a reform Work Plan were prepared through multi‑round consultations, yet procedural ambiguities and divergent formulations across documents risk undercutting consensus‑based outcomes (wto.org).
  • India is also pressing for formal technology‑transfer commitments to assist developing countries, alongside defending public stockholding for food security; the U.S. rejects anything less than a permanent e‑commerce moratorium (livemint.com).
  • Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement has broad support (over three‑quarters of WTO members) and an EIB‑WTO initiative is set to support its rollout in Africa, adding momentum to development‑focused reforms (eib.org).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is blocking WTO reform talks in Cameroon?
Large differences between most countries and the US and India are blocking consensus on WTO reforms, according to diplomats.
Why does India oppose a permanent e-commerce moratorium?
India fears loss of tariff revenue and believes the moratorium on customs duties for electronic transmissions should be reconsidered.
What are key concerns for the US in WTO reform negotiations?
The US wants a permanent extension of the e-commerce moratorium and opposes temporary measures.
How does India's stance affect developing countries in WTO talks?
India opposes including the Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement without full consensus, impacting plans to boost foreign investment in developing nations.
What is the issue with public stock holding (PHS) at the WTO?
There is a deadlock over India's demand for a permanent solution on public stock holding, which allows subsidies to farmers and raises concerns among major agricultural exporters.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category