Headlines

Samsung wins interim licence in UK patent fight with ZTE

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 25, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: January 23, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Samsung wins interim licence in UK patent fight with ZTE
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

LONDON (Reuters) -Samsung Electronics on Wednesday won a ruling from London's High Court in its attempt to get an interim licence to use ZTE's patents, in the English leg of the firms' global

Samsung Secures Interim License in UK Patent Dispute with ZTE

LONDON (Reuters) -Samsung Electronics on Wednesday won a ruling from London's High Court in its attempt to get an interim licence to use ZTE's patents, in the English leg of the firms' global licensing dispute over mobile phone patents.

English courts have recently permitted parties to pursue short-term patent licences pending trial, including in Amazon's dispute with Nokia and Lenovo's battle with Ericsson, before both ultimately settled.

Wednesday's ruling, though, is the first time in England that a court of first instance - the initial court where a case is heard - has made such an interim licence declaration.

Disputes over the fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms of a patent licence have frequently led to global legal battles in the telecom industry.

English courts can set global FRAND terms, following a landmark 2020 UK Supreme Court ruling, as can courts in China.

Samsung sued ZTE in London in December 2024 seeking a determination of FRAND terms, with ZTE bringing parallel lawsuits against Samsung in China, Germany and Brazil.

In London, Samsung sought a declaration that a willing licensor in ZTE's position would agree to an interim licence until FRAND terms were decided by the court.

Both Samsung and ZTE had made competing offers for an interim licence, with ZTE's licence requiring FRAND terms to be those determined by a court in China.

London's High Court ruled in Samsung's favour on Wednesday, with Judge James Mellor saying that "ZTE have acted in bad faith with their wave of unnecessary injunctive proceedings".

The judge added that "ZTE's terms are designed to render this action (in London) pointless, so that Samsung effectively has to abandon it" in favour of accepting the outcome of ZTE's lawsuit in Chongqing in southwestern China.

Samsung and ZTE did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin. Editing by Mark Potter)

Key Takeaways

  • Samsung wins interim licence in UK court against ZTE.
  • The ruling is a first for an interim licence in England.
  • FRAND terms disputes lead to global legal battles.
  • Samsung and ZTE are engaged in multiple lawsuits worldwide.
  • ZTE's actions deemed in bad faith by the UK judge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of Samsung's court ruling in London?
Samsung won a ruling from London's High Court for an interim license to use ZTE's patents.
What are FRAND terms in the context of this case?
FRAND stands for fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, which are often the subject of disputes in patent licensing.
What did Judge James Mellor say about ZTE's actions?
Judge James Mellor stated that ZTE acted in bad faith with unnecessary injunctive proceedings, aiming to make Samsung's London action pointless.
When did Samsung file the lawsuit against ZTE?
Samsung filed the lawsuit against ZTE in London in December 2024.
What is the significance of this ruling in the telecom industry?
This ruling is significant as it marks the first time an English court has made an interim license declaration in a patent dispute.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category