Finance

Dutch court orders xAI, Grok not to create, distribute non-consensual sex images in Netherlands

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 26, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
Dutch court orders xAI, Grok not to create, distribute non-consensual sex images in Netherlands
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

AMSTERDAM, March 26 (Reuters) - A Dutch court on Thursday ordered Elon Musk's xAI and chatbot Grok not to generate and distribute sexualized images of people without their consent in the Netherlands.

Dutch court rules against Grok over AI-generated 'undressing' images in rare legal rebuke

Landmark Dutch Court Ruling on AI-Generated Sexualized Images

Background of the Court Case

AMSTERDAM, March 26 (Reuters) - A Dutch court on Thursday ordered Elon Musk's xAI and chatbot Grok not to generate and distribute images "undressing" adults or children, or showing them in sexualised poses with scant or no clothing, without their consent in the Netherlands.

The Amsterdam Court's preliminary injunction, which could set a precedent in Europe, is one of the first times a judge has weighed in on xAI's responsibility for making tools that can be used to easily create sexualised images, amid a flood of complaints and investigations over Grok around the world.

Details of the Court's Decision

In a written decision, the court said xAI and Grok would be prohibited from "generating and/or distributing sexual imagery ... whereby persons are partially or wholly stripped naked without having given their explicit permission" and it would impose fines of 100,000 euros ($115,350) per day if the companies do not comply.

It also ordered xAI not to offer Grok on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, while in breach of the order.

Parties Involved

Role of Offlimits and Victims Support Fund

The case was brought by Offlimits, a Dutch nonprofit group that combats online sexual abuse, in cooperation with the nonprofit Victims Support Fund.

xAI's Response

A lawyer for xAI in the Netherlands referred questions to xAI. xAI did not respond to requests for comment.

Arguments Presented in Court

xAI's Position

At a hearing this month, xAI argued it could not stop all abuse of its tools and should not be penalized for the actions of malicious users.

Safeguards Implemented by xAI

Its lawyers said the company tightened safeguards in January to stop Grok from editing images of real people into revealing clothing, including by restricting image generation to paid subscribers.

Offlimits' Position

Offlimits director Robbert Hoving said judges had rejected that as insufficient after a March 9 courtroom demonstration showed Grok was still able to "undress" digital images of people without their consent. "The burden is on the company" to make sure its tools are not used to make nonconsensual sexual images, or sexualised AI images of children, Hoving said.

Broader European Context

Regulatory Scrutiny and Legislative Actions

The ruling comes as European regulators step up scrutiny of Grok and other AI tools under the EU’s Digital Services Act, which requires major platforms to curb illegal content. The European Commission opened a formal probe into X in January over risks tied to Grok’s rollout in the EU, including manipulated sexually explicit images. On Thursday, the European Parliament also backed a ban on AI “nudifier” apps that create or manipulate sexually explicit images.

Additional Information

($1 = 0.8669 euros)

(Reporting by Toby Sterling, Charlotte Van Campenhout, and Hakan Ersen; Editing by Susan Fenton, Rod Nickel and Chris Reese)

Key Takeaways

  • The Amsterdam District Court banned xAI and Grok from producing or distributing sexual imagery of individuals without explicit permission, including nudity and child sexual content, under Dutch law (nltimes.nl).
  • The lawsuit was initiated by Offlimits and the Victim Support Fund, highlighting that Grok enabled non‑consensual nude or sexualized deepfakes, including involving minors (nltimes.nl).
  • This decision comes amid broader global scrutiny of Grok: investigations and lawsuits in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere have raised concerns about its generation of non‑consensual and sexualized images (en.wikipedia.org)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Dutch court order regarding xAI and Grok?
The Dutch court ordered xAI and its chatbot Grok not to generate or distribute sexualized images of people without consent in the Netherlands.
Who brought the case against xAI and Grok?
The case was brought by Offlimits, a Dutch nonprofit group against online sexual abuse, with support from the Victims Support Fund.
What penalties will xAI and Grok face if they violate the order?
xAI and Grok face fines of 100,000 euros ($115,350) per day if they do not comply with the court order.
What measures did xAI claim to have taken against misuse of Grok?
xAI said it restricted Grok's image creation features to paid subscribers and took measures to prevent editing of images of real people in revealing clothing.
What did the court decide about xAI's responsibility?
The court decided that the burden is on xAI to ensure its tools are not used to create or distribute nonconsensual sexual images.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category